Felix savon: best amateur boxer

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ironside
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 2478
    • 94
    • 201
    • 8,897

    #11
    Savon is the greatest amateur of all time. If only he had gone pro, he most likely would have dominated the division for a loong time.

    Comment

    • AntonTheMeh
      STOP CRYIN
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2007
      • 21222
      • 700
      • 709
      • 31,623

      #12
      Originally posted by Deeznuts
      He beat David Tua, Shannon Briggs,Sultan Ibragimov, Davarryl Williamson and many more............out of 362 fights he only lost 21. Too bad he never was able to turn pro because of the government in Cuba. Look him up on youtube, he knocked most of these guys out with that killer right hand.
      deez you made that sig?

      Comment

      • AntonTheMeh
        STOP CRYIN
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 21222
        • 700
        • 709
        • 31,623

        #13
        felix savon vs shannon briggs

        Comment

        • jabsRstiff
          ! ! ! !
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2004
          • 8964
          • 498
          • 136
          • 16,167

          #14
          Understand that while Savon was excellent, he at times was a man facing boys.....same with Teo Stevenson.
          You really can't gauge how he'd have done as a pro, against seasoned & physically matured fighters.



          My choice is Mark Breland, as the best amateur of all time. He was incredibly dominant, & was a KO artist.....this without some of the advantages the MEN like Savon, Stevenson, & Abdullaev had.

          Comment

          • AntonTheMeh
            STOP CRYIN
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 21222
            • 700
            • 709
            • 31,623

            #15
            Originally posted by jabsRstiff
            Understand that while Savon was excellent, he at times was a man facing boys.....same with Teo Stevenson.
            You really can't gauge how he'd have done as a pro, against seasoned & physically matured fighters.


            My choice is Mark Breland, as the best amateur of all time. He was incredibly dominant, & was a KO artist.....this without some of the advantages the MEN like Savon, Stevenson, & Abdullaev had.
            WHAT ADVANTAGES?BRELAND WAS A SIX FOOT WELTERWEIGHT IN THE AMATEURS.

            Comment

            • jabsRstiff
              ! ! ! !
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2004
              • 8964
              • 498
              • 136
              • 16,167

              #16
              Originally posted by ANTONIM
              WHAT ADVANTAGES?BRELAND WAS A SIX FOOT WELTERWEIGHT IN THE AMATEURS.
              He still weighed 147lbs, didn't he ? Being that skinny isn't always an advantage....

              Savon & Stevenson were MEN facing boys, as I said.
              Abdullaev, defeated Cotto in the Olympics, partly because he was able to manhandle the kid. When they fought as pros, Cotto was the stronger fighter.

              Comment

              • AntonTheMeh
                STOP CRYIN
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2007
                • 21222
                • 700
                • 709
                • 31,623

                #17
                Originally posted by jabsRstiff
                He still weighed 147lbs, didn't he ? Being that skinny isn't always an advantage....

                Savon & Stevenson were MEN facing boys, as I said.
                Abdullaev, defeated Cotto in the Olympics, partly because he was able to manhandle the kid. When they fought as pros, Cotto was the stronger fighter.
                dude height is an advantage

                Comment

                • NAPO
                  Business are Unfinish
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 7477
                  • 262
                  • 292
                  • 14,922

                  #18
                  but this is the weird thing cubans are amazing amateur boxers they are the best but when is about profesional at least the ones that we have heard are not that great WHY??

                  Comment

                  • Ironside
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 2478
                    • 94
                    • 201
                    • 8,897

                    #19
                    Originally posted by NAPO
                    but this is the weird thing cubans are amazing amateur boxers they are the best but when is about profesional at least the ones that we have heard are not that great WHY??
                    Because I don't think they allow people from Cuba to turn pro. Most that go pro are the ones that were born in Cuba but fight outside of Cuba.

                    Comment

                    • NAPO
                      Business are Unfinish
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 7477
                      • 262
                      • 292
                      • 14,922

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Ironside
                      Because I don't think they allow people from Cuba to turn pro. Most that go pro are the ones that were born in Cuba but fight outside of Cuba.
                      but why they are not as successful as in their amateur days that's my question..do u think because they trained differently because they are not in cuba??

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP