Worst Judge

[Fox McCloud]

That you can think of...

I'd say Glen Hamada.

I remember he scored Jones Jr.-Tarver I 9 round to 3 for Jones.

I just rewatched Mayweather Jr.-Judah. He scored that 11 rounds to 1 for Floyd.

This guy can't score for ****.

[duffgun]

That you can think of...

I'd say Glen Hamada.

I remember he scored Jones Jr.-Tarver I 9 round to 3 for Jones.

I just rewatched Mayweather Jr.-Judah. He scored that 11 rounds to 1 for Floyd.

This guy can't score for ****.

micky vann

[THe TRiNiTY]

Jerry Roth (Horrible scoring in De La Hoya/Trinidad, by his dumbass) or Duane Ford (Scored the 12th round of Hopkins/Taylor I for Taylor, only man on the planet to do that.)

[BmoreBrawler]

Jerry Roth. **** him no way mayweather won the 12th round.

[starjammer]

Eugenia Williams (115-113 Holyfield in Lewis-Holyfield I) and Jerry Roth (I think he hates De la Hoya)

[Dynamite Kid]

That you can think of...

I'd say Glen Hamada.

I remember he scored Jones Jr.-Tarver I 9 round to 3 for Jones.

I just rewatched Mayweather Jr.-Judah. He scored that 11 rounds to 1 for Floyd.

This guy can't score for ****.

Tarver V Jones JR i cant remember how i scored that fight but 9-3 rounds is a bit lop sided but youhave to remember their were spells in that fight were Tarver was'nt throwing and was getting outworked at times i agree that 3-9 is wrong though

[Rane-Ex54]

I actually like Jerry Roth as a judge. He favors agressive foward fighters. I agree with the decidion that Tito won that fight, you have to watch the whole thing on mute.

[THe TRiNiTY]

I actually like Jerry Roth as a judge. He favors agressive foward fighters. I agree with the decidion that Tito won that fight, you have to watch the whole thing on mute.

I watched that fight in a room full of Mexicans and Puerto Ricans, I heard nothing. And I still think De La Hoya had 7 to 8 rounds for De La Hoya.

[Dynamite Kid]

Judging a fight is so subjective you can watch a fight for the first time and then watch it again second time around and sometimes you can get a different perspective on who won the fight i personally go on my first impressions of viewing a fight

dont get on my case but personally watching the Dela Hoya V Trinidad fight for the first time i thought Tito won , i thought Tito won by 1 round if my mermory serves my correct

i thought Dela Hoya Beat Mosley in the 2nd fight though , but i also thought Quartey beat Dela Hoya

i thought that Leonard beat Hagler ,i had Eubank beating Michael Watson in their 1st fight ,Watson did nt do enough to earn a win the most he could have expected to get was a draw he threw away the 1st half of the fight just like Hagler did against Leonard

and as everyone knows you only need 6 rounds so you dont lose a fight so if you can win the first 5 you only need 1 of the remaining 7 rounds to at least get a draw

[Rane-Ex54]

See & thats kind of why, if its close, people shouldn't blame the judges if it didn't go the way they thought. Wide Margins is what I worry about. Things like that judge giving Sergio Mora a 99-91 victory in that last ESPN fight....Now thats a paid off shady judge.