What is worst, Holding or Running???

[!! Mr. Soprano]

Answer the poll

[-Hyperion-]

Answer the poll

holding IMO......

[Easy-E]

Nothing is more boring than clinching, IMO.

[sonofisis]

Running is a sport in its self that at least involves action. Holding is just beyond lame, though I don't condone either in the context of boxing..

[The Fix]

holding is far worse, atleast if a fighter is "running" his opponent can attempt to cut off the ring, but when a fighter is constantly holding, it takes away from the fight, slows down the pace, wears down both fighters and is almost unavoidable.....

[joepal]

I vote both. Holding a la Hopkins and running a la Mayweather is what will kill the sport.

[EliteSoldier]

You can hit your opponent if they're holding still. You can't hit the opponent if they jog around the ring.

[brutal ko]

floyd and hatton is the worst cause they have both

[sonofisis]

I vote both. Holding a la Hopkins and running a la Mayweather is what will kill the sport.

Honestly, this must be a cheap shot since those are the two most accomplished people in the sport, with one of them being the face of boxing and winning every fight he's had. DLH ran from Trinidad in the final rounds, Floyd has never done anything like that... Also, Bernard doesn't intentionally hold, he's just dirty. Of course you're an idiot and don't care anyways..

[Easy-E]

You can hit your opponent if they're holding still. You can't hit the opponent if they jog around the ring.

Ummm...if your being HELD, you cant hit anyone.
Are you ****ing serious right now?