I really didn't bother judging this fight because of the fact I didn't believe it was going the distance but I think Pavlik was winning (not by much) by the time of the stoppage. Either way good fight and would like to see a rematch.
Judge's were going to rob Kelly....
Collapse
-
Rematch for what? Let me say this; If there is a rematch claus, you are already defeated. If I were champion, I would not give anyone a rematch, especially if I beat them the way Pavlik destroyed TaylorComment
-
How does anyone call a close fight such as this as you put it destroyed taylor? Thats like saying Israel Vazquez destroyed Rafael Marquez, even though that was a close fight... I'm sorry but that is just really dumb to say such a thing, I'm not calling you dumb. I'm saying what you said is completely dumb.Comment
-
What **** are talking about? How the **** can you say that Pavlik destroyed him when he was almost out in the second? It was a very good close fight with both getting kd.Comment
-
That was an assinine statement, the fight was very close with Jermain having the advantage before he was stopped, he was getting tired and was getting hit more though.Comment
-
You gotta be kidding. Taylor was ahead clear as day, 4 rounds to 2. You could give Pavlik round 1 and 3 and that is it.Comment
-
-
i believed taylor was winning (although i wasnt keeping score on paper; rather just keeping a mental note) even though by watching the fight it looked much closer...
kelly punched MORE
but taylor punched more accurately (much higher percentage)
and taylor had the better defense...
but i could have only had taylor up by maybe one round...Comment
-
I gave 1,3,6 to Pavlik So I had Jermain up by a ponit in the 7th. Very close fight. Doesnt matter caused Taylor in the end got owned like a lil boyComment
Comment