And I mean that in the sense that trainers and fighters alike WISH they could fight a whole fight (and career) like he did.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Greatest Welterweight Ever
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Kball15 View Postyour an idiot. you cant possibly hold it against a fighter because his opponents werent nearly as good as him. thats hilarious.
And these "primitive era fighters" didnt know of all these moves and ****, but had they known of them then they would do them better then anybody. SRR was the best of all times, and he was at his best at welterweight. can u explain urself?
Guys like Dempsey and Benny Leonard, THEY were primitive fighters.
YOU KNOW THAT IS NOT TRUE!!! We constantly hold it against fighters who do not fight opponents who are at least close to their caliber. That being said SRR fought the most champions of ANY OTHER BOXER EVER.
Comment
-
Originally posted by skilspaydabills View PostYOU KNOW THAT IS NOT TRUE!!! We constantly hold it against fighters who do not fight opponents who are at least close to their caliber. That being said SRR fought the most champions of ANY OTHER BOXER EVER.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DWiens421 View PostI'm not entirely sure who is the best, but considering after about 30 votes, Henry Armstrong had 0 votes, I had to pitch that one in... he defended the welterweight title 19 ****ing timesObservation from the self-appointed "language police:" An exclamation point (!) at the end of your statement would've had the same effect as the explitive. Language need not be salty to be effective...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nostromo View PostObservation from the self-appointed "language police:" An exclamation point (!) at the end of your statement would've had the same effect as the explitive. Language need not be salty to be effective...
Suck it!
Comment
Comment