Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Greatest Welterweight Ever

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by ianwigley View Post
    Ricky Hatton,

    You mean that bloke who got beat by Luis Collazo and Juan Urango, and the same bloke who beat up old shot fighters like Kosta and JLC?

    Yeah, greatest welterweight ever...for sure.

    Where you comin' from?
    pretty sure dios was jus messin around. ricky hatton is no where near being mentioned as being considered for a possible candidate spot as being one of the greats. everbody get that?

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by revs1227 View Post
      lol no hes liek 75 he comes 2 my gym everyday
      he might have been lol
      what r u tryin 2 imply
      I'm saying that 1) Emile Griffith is gay, and 2) your sexuality is suspect.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by dino View Post
        none of those guys, thomas hearns is the best welterweight, im so sick of idiots posting guys saying their the "greatest" from primitive era's of boxing.

        ray robinson fought against people who didnt have his speed or reflexes, hearns and leoanard would beat him
        your an idiot. you can possibly hold it against a fighter because his opponents werent nearly as good as him. thats hilarious.

        And these "primitive era fighters" didnt know of all these moves and ****, but had they known of them then they would do them better then anybody. SRR was the best of all times, and he was at his best at welterweight. can u explain urself?

        Guys like Dempsey and Benny Leonard, THEY were primitive fighters.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Kball15 View Post
          your an idiot. you can possibly hold it against a fighter because his opponents werent nearly as good as him. thats hilarious.

          And these "primitive era fighters" didnt know of all these moves and ****, but had they known of them then they would do them better then anybody. SRR was the best of all times, and he was at his best at welterweight. can u explain urself?

          Guys like Dempsey and Benny Leonard, THEY were primitive fighters.
          Dino is kinda right, Hearns isn't even on the list. He definetaly deserves to be up there and I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of people picked him as GOAT.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Kball15 View Post
            your an idiot. you can possibly hold it against a fighter because his opponents werent nearly as good as him. thats hilarious.

            And these "primitive era fighters" didnt know of all these moves and ****, but had they known of them then they would do them better then anybody. SRR was the best of all times, and he was at his best at welterweight. can u explain urself?

            Guys like Dempsey and Benny Leonard, THEY were primitive fighters.
            i love sugar ray robinson i think he was incredible. but i really dont think that in todays era of fighters, he would be #1. they fought in way different time periods and athletes now are quicker, stronger and smarter. thats jus evolution working cant do anytihng about that. he would be a top 5 welter no doubt about it, but there are guys who could beat him at welter.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Ironside View Post
              Dino is kinda right, Hearns isn't even on the list. He definetaly deserves to be up there and I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of people picked him as GOAT.
              i wasnt commentating on that part, i was talking about the "primitive fighter" part

              Comment


              • #27
                Ray robinson without a doubt.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by DIOS DOMINICANO View Post
                  I'm saying that 1) Emile Griffith is gay, and 2) your sexuality is suspect.
                  this is about boxing not ppls sexual prefrence grow up my friend
                  he is rated #1 all time on boxrec 2

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by revs1227 View Post
                    this is about boxing not ppls sexual prefrence grow up my friend
                    he is rated #1 all time on boxrec 2
                    Did you notice Ray Robinson is not listed on the welterweight all time list? Boxrec only allows a fighter to be ranked in one all time weightclass... boxrec's records suck ass anyway. Look at their P4P list, it doesn't make any sense.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      I understand the love for Sugar #1 but I think Henry Armstrong should be a little closer. His style is the most salivated over in the history of boxing, IMHO.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP