Tweet
*****, this sum dum ass ****. u a knucklehead fo tryin to suggest a correlation between the red cross and starving people and mayweather and money hungry people. *****, if they at the damn mtv awards them mu***as aint starvin. ****head.
-
-
You just to ******ed to get the picture I am try to paint. Comprehesion can take you many places in life learn it before you talk **** about something you don't understand. Remember there are no ****** questions if you didn't understand all you had to do was ask for a explanation. Instead you showed yourself to get frustrated at the unknown and all you knew how to do was act out. They have professional help for people like you try to get some. It might actually be free through whatever state you live in depending on how ****ed up you are.
For the mentally challenged people such as the person I am replying to. Basically what I am getting at is you can't blame the Red Cross for those peoples actions just like you can't blame PBF for those money hungry peoples actions.Comment
-
I understood what you were trying to say, but a starving person should not be compared to a person who is just being greedy. Furthermore, the redcross has guidelines, rules etc. that those seeking their assistance must follow. They do their best to maintain order and to keep things peaceful and productive. I do believe there is no way to compare the purposeful riot starting of Mayweather to the red cross. I do not think Floyd is to be held accountible for the actions of the people who went after the money. However, Floyd got the reaction he was looking for. He knew throwing that money would cause people to lose it.Comment
-
Floyd just being Floyd, you think he knew the possible damage he coulda caused nope, do you think he cares not really, should we care nope.....Comment
-
I am not suprised you understood what I was getting at you have in past displayed reading comprehension. Greed is greed they are both sins none the less. There are also rules for behavior at concerts. Security at concerts do there best to maintain order. Do they not in most cases? So you think PBF tried to start a riot? You can't blame another grown person's actions on somebody else so thats neither here nor there. So you think the reaction PBF was looking for was people almost dying if the situation would have went way too far? I would have to disagree with that opinion even though you are entitled to it.
Well since the Red Cross analogy is rubbing some people the wrong way how about this.
It is the fault of the child that breaks open the Pinata when all the other children start to go crazy and trample each other to get as much candy as they can possibly get?Comment
-
I get your analogies, in theory. They all make sense. However, because candy and food hold no torch to money, I can not acquiesce. I do agree security etc. is important. However, let me clarify. No, I do not think that Floyd wanted people to die. He probably was not expecting the stage to almost collapse. What I do feel, is that he wanted people to go crazy adoring him and going after the money, which is what they did. Money makes people crazy, which is obvious. Those people almost lost their lives, and Floyd is not to blame for that. However, he has a history of ensuing issue because of money. Has not he learned anything from Pacman's situation. LOL. Hopefully this will cause him to realize that throwing "rain" is not necessary all of the time. I do not think Floyd is to be held accountible for the behaviors of the people. However, insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results every time. He knows when he makes it "rain", people lose it. That is all I am saying.Comment
-
I don't know supposed beautiful lady(haven't seen a pic to verify but I'll take your word for it) children in 99% of cases will take candy over money. Just making a case for my premise but 99% of adult people money over candy all day. I agree with a lot of what you have to say.Comment
-
I agree with a lot of your points, too. I appreciate your maturity.Comment
Comment