Can anyone beat Mayweather?

[larrytyson]

I would give Mosley v Cotto winner a chance!

[gixxer]

I would give Mosley v Cotto winner a chance!

so would i but it aint gonna happen if cotto wins that fight........id like to see either guy fight floyd.....but really cotto cause he has the style i like better

[larrytyson]

so would i but it aint gonna happen if cotto wins that fight........id like to see either guy fight floyd.....but really cotto cause he has the style i like better

I think Cotto will beat Shane! But the funny thing is that Shane would do better aginst floyd! IMO! (dunno)

[gixxer]

I knew you were going to call the Margarito-Williams fight a robbery, so predictable.

Anyways, he has said that he is not going to retire again, he said he is back now because the fans revived his interest. He will actually most likely fight the winner of Cotto-Mosley.

EDIT: The difference between Mayweather winning his fight and Margarito winning his, is that Mayweather landed more punches, and Margarito didn't. So **** YOU!

If you check again those rounds you will notice that 90% of Williams punches landed on Margarito's gloves. If you erase of your analysis ALL those punches and the unsignifying pit-pats, you will see a very different fight. I don't know why tv networks started displaying that crazy "punch stat" thing. Pro boxing is NOT the Olympics, man. You can't give away a decisioin to the "busiest" man if he is not being effective.

[gixxer]

I think Cotto will beat Shane! But the funny thing is that Shane would do better aginst floyd! IMO! (dunno)

i think he would just outpoint him easier than cotto but cotto will fight a harder more enterraing fight even if he takes damge to give damage.....i have either guy beating him just easier for mosley though i want to see both guys get a crack regardless

[larrytyson]

i think he would just outpoint him easier than cotto but cotto will fight a harder more enterraing fight even if he takes damge to give damage.....i have either guy beating him just easier for mosley though i want to see both guys get a crack regardless

agreed! Cotto fight would be more entertaing

[OptimusWolf]

it's threads like these and comments such as "No one can beat floyd" that show the mental midgetry of this forum.

Of course Floyd can be beaten. Cotto, Mosley and Hatton all have a chance of beating him, Oscar certainly could and maybe should have beaten him, and I'd favour williams over him 60-40.

[kayjay]

it's threads like these and comments such as "No one can beat floyd" that show the mental midgetry of this forum.

Of course Floyd can be beaten. Cotto, Mosley and Hatton all have a chance of beating him, Oscar certainly could and maybe should have beaten him, and I'd favour williams over him 60-40.

The person who made the thread was just asking IF anyone and WHO can do it. I don't see a problem with that. It was't "nobody can beat Floyd." It seems most posters gave an affirmative answer

[pesticid]

If you check again those rounds you will notice that 90% of Williams punches landed on Margarito's gloves. If you erase of your analysis ALL those punches and the unsignifying pit-pats, you will see a very different fight. I don't know why tv networks started displaying that crazy "punch stat" thing. Pro boxing is NOT the Olympics, man. You can't give away a decisioin to the "busiest" man if he is not being effective.

Actually, even in the olympics when you hit somebody on the gloves it doesn't count. Professional judging is more corrupt than amateur judging. I mean you've got a guy like De Leon winning 12 rounds against Penalosa. That's a joke right?

[realheavyhands]

that will never happen because the coward always picks the easy fights.

yup his team is too smart they know who they can definately beat and those are the only fights they take