Tweet
Floyd didn't massacre Oscar.
Floyd didn't destroy Oscar.
Anyone who says he did either one is a dumbass, and I don't have any respect for them, just like you.
I felt Floyd won 115-113, because Oscar only fought for the last little bit of quite a few rounds in an attempt to steal them, but he didn't land the majority of his punches in those flurries. However, because it was a fight that one fighter excelled in certain categories, and the other fighter excelled in the other categories, a split decision certainly wasn't a bad decision IMO.
If Oscar would have fought for 3 minutes of 7 of the rounds, he would have deserved a UD (provided Floyd fought the same way), because he did land the harder shots when he landed the, but he just didn't throw enough, which means he didn't land enough.
Floyd didn't destroy Oscar.
Anyone who says he did either one is a dumbass, and I don't have any respect for them, just like you.
I felt Floyd won 115-113, because Oscar only fought for the last little bit of quite a few rounds in an attempt to steal them, but he didn't land the majority of his punches in those flurries. However, because it was a fight that one fighter excelled in certain categories, and the other fighter excelled in the other categories, a split decision certainly wasn't a bad decision IMO.
If Oscar would have fought for 3 minutes of 7 of the rounds, he would have deserved a UD (provided Floyd fought the same way), because he did land the harder shots when he landed the, but he just didn't throw enough, which means he didn't land enough.
Comment