Was Morales Robbed?

[brently1979]

looking at the scorecards those judges should be sacked on the spot, absolutly sickening

As usual the judges don't have to answer to anyone, but they should. If this fight had of been in Vegas, different story.

[DiegoFuego]

I believe he was robbed after sitting down and scoring it. The judges awarded every close round to Diaz and pretty much gave Morales the rounds he clearly won (like 3, 4, 5 and 9). Here is my card.

DIAZ ROUND MORALES
8 1 10
10 2 9
9 3 10
9 4 10
9 5 10
9 6 10
10 7 9
9 8 10
9 9 10
10 10 9
10 11 9
10 12 9
112 TOTAL 115

[col Blake]

It's about time their was an appeals panel for this kind of thing, since boxing began there has been this prob and nobody wants to do anything about it as next week everyone has forgot about it as their is another dodgy decision.
bastard judges, ex boxers should be doing it they still can be bought but at least they now about boxing unlike these ****ers.

[DiegoFuego]

I mean sometimes it's hard to tell who's landing and who isn't the first time you watch something (which is all the judges have), but when one guy clearly wins 5-6 rounds and the other guy struggles to clearly win any, there's something wrong with giving him every close round.

[col Blake]

I wonder if the judges should be at ring side why can't they be somewhere else watching it on a monitor away from the crowd, you could infact judge the fight anywhere in the world and nobody should no who the judges are until the first bell i think this would stop the ****ing cheats, have i just come up with the best idea ever

[Agave]

I think Diaz won...!

He's the Champ.. close fight goes to tha Champ... Morales has been in this Bizz a long time he should know... You either Knock the guy out or you beat the guy convincely for most of the fight!!! Is Diaz's back yard!

Morales eres un grandisimo pendeho!

[DiegoFuego]

On a side note, did Diaz not land a punch when Morales went down in round 2? That should have been called a knockdown if I'm not mistaken. Someone please clarify

[DLT]

My 1st response on this thread but all I wanted to say is that there's a difference between a robbery and just thinking Morales won. It sounds like alot of you think it was a robbery but it also sounds like some of you are saying it was a robbery even though you think it was a close fight. There's no way it couldve went to Diaz?

[DiegoFuego]

Well normally I say any fight where I score 7 rounds to one guy can't be a robbery if it goes the other way; however, I thought Morales clearly won at least 5-6 rounds. Diaz clearly won 2 or 3 and many were damn close. What I don't understand is how all the judges can give Diaz every close round, especially when Morales outlanded him most of the rounds and landed the cleaner, more accurate punches. It was close though so robbery is a tough word to use.

[-Hyperion-]

My 1st response on this thread but all I wanted to say is that there's a difference between a robbery and just thinking Morales won. It sounds like alot of you think it was a robbery but it also sounds like some of you are saying it was a robbery even though you think it was a close fight. There's no way it couldve went to Diaz?

ill put it like this, if diaz won close, then de la hoya should've won wide vs floyd....diaz's was ineffective aggression at its clearest...