Manny Pacquiao: Preying on the weak

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sweat
    PunchThatMakesUPanic
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2004
    • 1403
    • 93
    • 88
    • 8,544

    #1

    Manny Pacquiao: Preying on the weak

    By Kenneth Bouhairie: Earlier this month, Oscar De La Hoya’s Golden Boy Promotions and Bob Arum’s Top Rank announced the rematch between Manny Pacquiao and a decidedly faded Marco Antonio Barrera. Upon hearing the news, this writer hoped for a message board mutiny. Barrera-Pacquiao II? Will boxing fans really pay $44.95 to watch PacMan devour another ghost?

    Evidently, there’s little hope for the paying public when a Swiss banker, a lawyer and the most PC boxer of his time brainstorm together. Instead of assailing the latest pay-per-sham, scribes could be heard playing Peaches and Herb oldies while typing away. The reunion of the promotional powerhouses was the headline, their first product an afterthought, as if we should be pacified by these Richie Rich’s deciding to play nice in the sandbox.

    Floyd Mayweather Jr. can only dream of such media adoration. The five-division champ’s business-minded approach in the ring and hip-hop styled braggadocio outside it have made him a magnet for criticism. Team Pacquiao has its own form of disdain for the paying public, but the keyboards are silent. Maybe that’s because Manny always comes to fight. Perhaps it’s his non-abrasive attitude. Whatever the reason, the masses haven’t taken him to task for this latest rematch that reeks of a final payday for an old warrior and a low-risk, high-reward bout for a fighter in his prime.

    This article isn’t meant to bash Pacquiao, although I suspect my inbox will be flooded with letters from General Santos City. “How dare you,” they’ll cry. “Pacquiao is a gladiator who will take on anybody.” Yes, Pacquiao is a gladiator, but the second half of the previous sentence is subject to debate.

    Since his 2003 destruction of Barrera, Pacquiao has dominated his division. His following has grown with each knockout, from local stardom in his native Philippines to a worldwide following. But behind Manny’s unforgiving fists and cloak of invincibility lies a naked truth. Those who look beyond the trademark red shoes and “No Fear” bandana can hear the whirring sound of a money machine. As Pacquiao has gone from raging bull to cash cow, the quality of his opposition has diminished markedly.

    Barrera turned professional at age 15. After 69 fights and countless wars, he’s a blunted weapon. Moreover, the Mexican legend is coming off a loss to Juan Manual Marquez — a fight which, except for a couple of moments, Marquez dominated.

    There had been talk of Pacquiao fighting Humberto Soto or defensive wizard Joan Guzman prior to the announcement of Pacquiao-Barrera II. Soto thrashed Rocky Juarez two years ago, only to witness Juarez get a shot against Barrera. Rocky, in turn, exposed Barrera’s decline.

    Meanwhile, for years, Barrera avoided a rematch against Pacquiao. Now 33, on his last legs and out of options, he has opted for one last big pay-day.

    Fans will probably forgive Barrera if he exits quickly. Erik Morales, Jose Luis Castillo and Lamon Brewster are recent examples of fighters who, after tasting serious leather, appeared more interested in cashing their check than earning it. In their younger years, they would have fought fire with fire. But their bodies had suffered through too much to summon that kind of will again. Don’t be surprised to see a similar outcome when Barrera gets reacquainted with Manny’s blazing left hand power.

    A look at Pacquiao’s resume since he took Barrera apart shows a troubling pattern:

    PACQUIAO VS. JUAN MANUEL MARQUEZ – DRAW

    If not for an incredible first round that found Marquez on the canvas three times, Pacquiao would have been on the losing end of the decision. Once Marquez found his footing, he soundly outboxed his opponent, creating a blueprint that fellow Mexican Erik Morales followed against Pacquiao a year later. Still, all credit to Manny for taking on a worthy opponent following his huge upset over Barrera.

    PACQUIAO TKO 4 OVER FAHSAN 3K BATTERY

    3K was the perfect set-up. His previous opponents had a composite 47% winning percentage. But we’ll give Pacquiao a pass. He was entitled to a soft touch after back to back fights against Mexico’s best.

    ERIK MORALES UD12 OVER PACQUIAO

    Fresh off his second loss to Barrera, few expected the aging Morales to remain standing against Pacquiao, much less pull off the upset. But the match was intriguing and Morales still had a name, which was why this fight was made. The cagey Mexican used his overlooked boxing skills to keep Pacquiao at the end of his punches and walk away with a spirited unanimous decision.

    PACQUIAO TKO6 OVER HECTOR VELAZQUEZ

    Pacquiao battered the journeyman with searing combinations to the head and body. Velazquez was game but eventually wilted under assault.

    PACQUIAO TKO10 OVER ERIK MORALES

    “El Terrible” had looked plain terrible in losing his previous fight against Zahir Raheem. That had ruined all hope of Morales-Pacquiao II; or so we thought. But like Zab Judah (who lost to Carlos Baldomir and next fought Floyd Mayweather Jr), Morales was rewarded for his loss with a big purse in his next fight. Against Pacquiao, Morales started strong but his legs faltered in the middle rounds. He resembled a piñata over the last three.

    PACQUIAO UD12 OVER OSCAR LARIOS

    Larios, fresh off a TKO loss to Israel Vasquez, moved up two divisions to serve as another homecoming victim for the native son.

    PACQUIAO KO3 OVER ERIK MORALES

    Morales had been slapped silly by Zahir Raheem and blown out in the rematch against Pacquiao, so why not go for the trifecta? Fans shelled out $44.95 for a nine-minute going away party. Morales winked to his corner as the ref counted him out.

    PACQUIAO KO8 OVER JORGE SOLIS

    Solis was competitive early, but eventually fell under a hail of Pacquiao bombs. It was a good “stay busy” fight. Except Manny has had too many of those lately. His stiffest challenge these past few years came from Darlene Antonino-Custodio, who scored a TKO over Pacquiao several months ago when she won their battle for a congressional seat in the Philippines.

    The string of suspect bouts continues on October 6th with Pacquiao against Barrera. Golden Boy and Top Rank will be celebrated for putting aside their juvenile cold war as they line their pockets. Diehard fans, having been force-fed one uneventful pay-per-view card after another on HBO-PPV, will lay down another $44.95, hoping that the “Baby-Faced Assassin” has one more great fight left in him. Don’t bet on it.

    As long as we’re buying, Pacquiao’s increasingly transparent act will continue. Poor Barrera may look the part of a sacrificial lamb on fight night. But it’s the fans, not Barrera, who are being exploited.

    August 2, 2007



    What is this writer smoking? When Pacquiao beat barrera in 2003, all of a sudden they said Barrera is a beaten fighter too many hard fights etc. Then he came and beat Morales for their trilogy and outboxed Rocky Juarez and lost a close decision to one of the all time great featherweight of this era, Juan Manuel Marquez. Now that barrera lost a close decision and is fighting Pacquiao, all of a sudden he's another ghost that Pacquiao is gonna devour? That is total non sense to me. I actually think Pacquiao is smart (no nutghugging on this one) to not fight the likes of Joan Guzman or Humberto Soto etc. because casual boxing fans don't even know who those guys are! And there is no way it would cement his legacy if he were to beat those guys. If he beats Marquez in a sensational fashion, I think that would be the climax of his career and people would consider him as one of the best featherweights of all time. I really didn't see a point of this writer's article. He first said that Barrera is a ghost waiting to be devoured, then in the end he talked about the price of the PPV and that people are getting ripped off etc.. What an idiot
  • Sinisterevo
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • May 2006
    • 657
    • 18
    • 1
    • 6,958

    #2
    there are some good points there, but I think Barrera is game and is not a washed up fighter as was mentioned. But I do think Pac needs to fight the best fighters in the division especially while he is still in his prime - dont wait until your skills have diminished...you'll regret it later.

    Comment

    • DiegoFuego
      Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2005
      • 17338
      • 1,403
      • 586
      • 24,657

      #3
      That's a terrific article and I agree on every point

      EXCEPT when he claims Marquez outboxed Pacquiao. That's nonsense. Pacquiao tore Marquez up between rounds 7 and 10, yet people still think Marquez was competitive that night? Not on the cards he wasn't.

      But yeah Pacquiao should be fighting Soto and Guzman. Surely he'll fight the winner?
      Last edited by DiegoFuego; 08-03-2007, 02:20 PM.

      Comment

      • DiegoFuego
        Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2005
        • 17338
        • 1,403
        • 586
        • 24,657

        #4
        I love Pacquiao by the way for making me realize what a prick Morales is and for annihilating Barrera and making me quite rich that night for picking him to pull the "upset"

        Comment

        • BIGPOPPAPUMP
          Franchise Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2003
          • 46539
          • 2,259
          • 334
          • 5,493,285

          #5
          The article has little research done.

          He called Velasquez a journeyman and the guy is only 32, and riding a decent win streak since the Pacquiao loss, including a win over brother Bobby and recently decisioned highly touted unbeaten prospect Mario Santiago.

          Comment

          • Sweat
            PunchThatMakesUPanic
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2004
            • 1403
            • 93
            • 88
            • 8,544

            #6
            Originally posted by DiegoFuego
            That's a terrific article and I agree on every point

            EXCEPT when he claims Marquez outboxed Pacquiao. That's nonsense. Pacquiao tore Marquez up between rounds 7 and 10, yet people still think Marquez was competitive that night? Not on the cards he wasn't.

            But yeah Pacquiao should be fighting Soto and Guzman. Surely he'll fight the winner?
            how was that a terrific article??

            Comment

            • Crazy Dude
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Jun 2006
              • 644
              • 24
              • 52
              • 7,083

              #7
              I agree with his overall point.

              Comment

              • Chups
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2004
                • 18400
                • 1,835
                • 1,281
                • 52,879

                #8
                Why the **** did the RING ratings put Barrera at P4P number 9 if he's weak??


                Now that everything is done...it's so easy to say that the competition was weak. But actually Pac made them look all weak. Guess who KOed Barrera and Morales in thier Career? Yep only Pac...nobody else can.

                Nobody else wanted JMM in his prime but Pac did..........Pac was the underdog in all of the superfights except for the third Morales fight (and maybe the 1st). (Pac-Barrera 4-1 underdog) (Pac-JMM -110/+110 underdog) (Pac-EM 2)

                Comment

                • MaYaN_SuN
                  Banned
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 4090
                  • 163
                  • 0
                  • 4,325

                  #9
                  It's a decent article, Paq came into boxing at the end of the biggest names careers. Now he's bein able to milk that cause Barrera and Morales just cant let go of the sport.

                  The blame cant go to Pac though. It's Barrera's and Morales' fault, they're old asses are preventing real fights from happening cause they can't just sit still and come to grips with their end. But I'm sure for a boxer, thats easier said then done. If they didnt know it was their time to leave then, they do now. But a post war torn Barrera and Morales vs Pac would have been far more interesting, lol obviously.

                  And I disagree with the guys input he had on Paq vs Larios. That was Paq's most impressive win, to me. Larios is huge, tough, and has/had a decent punch. Pac took em 12 and got a decisive decision.

                  Comment

                  • -Antonio-
                    -Antonio-
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2005
                    • 24259
                    • 629
                    • 163
                    • 38,153

                    #10
                    Its an interesting argument.

                    If his next fight isnt against Goazman/Soto or JMM then we have a big problem.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP