Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How will Calzaghe-fans on this forum look like if

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Technical_Skill View Post
    I'll go along with this, if Kessler wins its fine by me, i'll happily admit i was wrong, i still think kessler will get overwelhmed though, i still think he has good boxing skills, but is hype.
    Are you serious TS because of the two I reckon Cal is hype , he is the one with all the raps on him , all the publicity , always slagging somebody down , even Kessler was a ****man before the fight now its on its his toughest and Hopkins and Mundine are ****man , Cals the mouth and the hype , not Kessler ,
    Kessler is the quite one with not much publicity not much noise just a quite achiever , the guy hardly says a bad word about anybody , but he did say to joe , if you dare lol , then when you look at Joes resume its ordinary , this whole JC thing is the biggest con since Al Capone . the guy has beat nobody to justify whats getting said , his resume is propped by old men and propped fighters , I,ll debate the great JC and who he has beaten anytime you like because he has nothing in there that makes him an elite fighter .

    Hey Naz-Fan , evertime I see your avatar all I can see is Barrera schooling him , sorry but thats the vision I get .

    Comment


    • #42
      For being a complete jack ass RodBarker, I hope you leave or get banned from this website if Kessler loses.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by RodBarker View Post
        Are you serious TS because of the two I reckon Cal is hype , he is the one with all the raps on him , all the publicity , always slagging somebody down , even Kessler was a ****man before the fight now its on its his toughest and Hopkins and Mundine are ****man , Cals the mouth and the hype , not Kessler ,
        Kessler is the quite one with not much publicity not much noise just a quite achiever , the guy hardly says a bad word about anybody , but he did say to joe , if you dare lol , then when you look at Joes resume its ordinary , this whole JC thing is the biggest con since Al Capone . the guy has beat nobody to justify whats getting said , his resume is propped by old men and propped fighters , I,ll debate the great JC and who he has beaten anytime you like because he has nothing in there that makes him an elite fighter .

        Hey Naz-Fan , evertime I see your avatar all I can see is Barrera schooling him , sorry but thats the vision I get .
        I didnt get to read all of this, cos i got some muppet telling me fighting Byron Mitchell and Charles Brewer is the same as fighting DLH, Trinidad and Jones Jr,

        What i will say is this

        - Yes i am serious.

        - Yes Calzaghe is unbelievably hyped on NSB for reasons i dont know.

        - Yes Calzaghe's resume doesnt warrant the hype he gets

        but.

        Kessler = Robot, the footwork equivalent of the terminator, and thats why i reckon he will get beat by JC.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Technical_Skill View Post
          I'll go along with this, if Kessler wins its fine by me, i'll happily admit i was wrong, i still think kessler will get overwelhmed though, i still think he has good boxing skills, but is hype.
          Originally posted by Technical_Skill View Post
          I didnt get to read all of this, cos i got some muppet telling me fighting Byron Mitchell and Charles Brewer is the same as fighting DLH, Trinidad and Jones Jr,

          What i will say is this

          - Yes i am serious.

          - Yes Calzaghe is unbelievably hyped on NSB for reasons i dont know.

          - Yes Calzaghe's resume doesnt warrant the hype he gets

          but.

          Kessler = Robot, the footwork equivalent of the terminator, and thats why i reckon he will get beat by JC.
          You got an unbiased opinion TS and you are backing your opinion without the moronic bull**** these other JC fanboys come up with , you know as well as I do JC has beat not much but you give valid reasons why you think he wins .
          I disagree and think Kessler with beat him but respect your opinion .


          Elite Soldier ,,, go away child , hope I get banned , what for being right , lots of children in here that carnt discuss or debate very good
          Last edited by RodBarker; 07-22-2007, 06:35 PM.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by RodBarker View Post
            You got an unbiased opinion TS and you are backing your opinion without the moronic bull**** these other JC fanboys come up with
            Ahaha. What you mean is that he dislikes Calzaghe which you enjoy. The unbiased opinion is the one that most sensible Calzaghe fans (of which there are many of us on here) have. That Kessler is a good boxer and will be a top-notch opponent for Calzaghe, however Calzaghe is too fast, too busy and is more technically sound, awkward and diverse for Kessler to have anything more than a 40%ish chance of winning, MAX.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Miksterious View Post
              Ahaha. What you mean is that he dislikes Calzaghe which you enjoy.
              Im not a hater, seriously, but when people start Talking about Calzaghe being better than Roy Jones, James Toney, even Mayweather (yes there was a thread i think a while back when people voted for calzaghe being a better fighter than Mayweather lol), then i will say something about it, cos its just rediculous, Calzaghe is a world class fighter in a poor divsion, thats it for me.

              Comment


              • #47
                I never said you were a hater, just that you dislike him.

                In regards to the question of him being better than Mayweather, I think that the vast majority of people who picked the Calzaghe option there, defined the question differently than you. I figured it as being a better fighter than boxer by the deliberate phrasology of the question. Thus meaning that if PBF and Joe had a fight, outside of a boxing ring, no gloves...who would win?

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Miksterious View Post
                  I never said you were a hater, just that you dislike him.

                  In regards to the question of him being better than Mayweather, I think that the vast majority of people who picked the Calzaghe option there, defined the question differently than you. I figured it as being a better fighter than boxer by the deliberate phrasology of the question. Thus meaning that if PBF and Joe had a fight, outside of a boxing ring, no gloves...who would win?
                  Nah, they meant better fighter inside the ring, the whole thing was just embarassing for NSB, grown men trying to argue that mayweather was the better boxer and calzaghe was the better fighter, rediculous when mayweather went up 5 weight classes and kept de la hoya honest with his power.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    But if they were to brawl. Calzaghe would win. Hence why he is the better fighter.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      oh by fighter i thought you mean if mayweather had his arms tied behind his back and was blindfolded and calzaghe had a krowbar so thats why i voted for calzaghe.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP