Roy Jones and Mike Tyson

[porlie]

Agree with your PM by the way, went into that thread to see a certain guy determined to have an arguement, lol.

Thing im watching the Tennis on TV at the moment.

LOL wonder who was determined?? aye make the most of the tennis mate lol not be long before another downpour stops it.

[gigogreco]

Why is it most of their diehard fans are 12 to 16 years old??
Why is it most of the young kids think these 2 men are best of all time??
Why is it most of their fans think both men were unbeatbale in their prime??

Discuss

GooGoo

thats a fairly ****** post, i doubt that the majority of fans, who did enjoy jones and tyson is aged between 12-16

i would be inclined to ask you, why fans of chavez who rate him so high and cant see he lost to whitaker.. does that mean they have the brain of a 6 year old..

same ****** way of asking..

and if you cant see why fans find tyson and jones exciting, then wow...

i would bet you, that you would find a lot of fans claiming jones is the best ever at 160, 168 and one of the greates at 175..

and you could also find fans, claiming tyson in his prime could beat anyone put infront of him..

so whether you are 12, 27 or 55, doesnt matter

[porlie]

Agree with your PM by the way, went into that thread to see a certain guy determined to have an arguement, lol.

Thing im watching the Tennis on TV at the moment.

thats a fairly ****** post, i doubt that the majority of fans, who did enjoy jones and tyson is aged between 12-16

i would be inclined to ask you, why fans of chavez who rate him so high and cant see he lost to whitaker.. does that mean they have the brain of a 6 year old..

same ****** way of asking..

and if you cant see why fans find tyson and jones exciting, then wow...

i would bet you, that you would find a lot of fans claiming jones is the best ever at 160, 168 and one of the greates at 175..

and you could also find fans, claiming tyson in his prime could beat anyone put infront of him..

so whether you are 12, 27 or 55, doesnt matter

Excellent post , a boxing fan knows talent when they see one it dont matter if the fans 16 or 96.

[demirturk]

IMo roy jones is top 5 of all time. hes tied with the other 4

[demirturk]

thats a fairly ****** post, i doubt that the majority of fans, who did enjoy jones and tyson is aged between 12-16

i would be inclined to ask you, why fans of chavez who rate him so high and cant see he lost to whitaker.. does that mean they have the brain of a 6 year old..

same ****** way of asking..

and if you cant see why fans find tyson and jones exciting, then wow...

i would bet you, that you would find a lot of fans claiming jones is the best ever at 160, 168 and one of the greates at 175..

and you could also find fans, claiming tyson in his prime could beat anyone put infront of him..

so whether you are 12, 27 or 55, doesnt matter

you forget 154 ! who is going to beath him ?? delahoya? trinidag? vargas? lol lol lol .

[gigogreco]

you forget 154 ! who is going to beath him ?? delahoya? trinidag? vargas? lol lol lol .

yeah you could include him there, but i wont ;-)

on the top of my head i actually dont think he fought much at that weight, and if you consider it has to be in his prime, then 154 is out of the question.

otherwise jones is as talented as it comes in boxing..

[gigogreco]

Excellent post , a boxing fan knows talent when they see one it dont matter if the fans 16 or 96.

doesnt matter at all..

even the most hatefull and anti tyson and jones fan, have to admit, that physically we are talking about specimens, who cant be copied.. im not a historical boxing fan, but these 2 stand out as to physical gifts, ive never seen fighters come close to neither tyson or jones in that department

i have never, and i doubt i ever will, see a man weighing 220, with such a speed, power, accuracy timing and movement as tyson in his prime.. every hw of this generation, should as a part of their training, be forced to watchtapes of hi training and hopefully learn from this unique physically gifted fighter..

[porlie]

doesnt matter at all..

even the most hatefull and anti tyson and jones fan, have to admit, that physically we are talking about specimens, who cant be copied.. im not a historical boxing fan, but these 2 stand out as to physical gifts, ive never seen fighters come close to neither tyson or jones in that department

i have never, and i doubt i ever will, see a man weighing 220, with such a speed, power, accuracy timing and movement as tyson in his prime.. every hw of this generation, should as a part of their training, be forced to watchtapes of hi training and hopefully learn from this unique physically gifted fighter..

Yeah thats why Jones and Tyson are rated,because in their primes they were something special. The likes of Jones and Tyson dont come along often so when they do people tend to note greatness.

[demirturk]

yeah you could include him there, but i wont ;-)

on the top of my head i actually dont think he fought much at that weight, and if you consider it has to be in his prime, then 154 is out of the question.

otherwise jones is as talented as it comes in boxing..

true. but since he made 154 i said it .