If Floyd fought 20 years ago...

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • deliveryman
    Your token white guy
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2006
    • 7592
    • 362
    • 178
    • 15,510

    #1

    If Floyd fought 20 years ago...

    What would his status be?

    Vote and discuss.
    70
    Fringe Contender
    12.86%
    9
    The elite 4 (Duran, Hagler, Leonard Hearns) + Floyd is now the elite 5.
    47.14%
    33
    Just a titleholder
    17.14%
    12
    Multi-division champion, but always second rate to the elite 4.
    22.86%
    16
    Last edited by deliveryman; 06-16-2007, 11:54 AM.
  • realheavyhands
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2004
    • 4519
    • 107
    • 0
    • 11,370

    #2
    the selections dont make sense to be a "just title holder" he would have to be able to beat some of them guys

    Comment

    • deliveryman
      Your token white guy
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Mar 2006
      • 7592
      • 362
      • 178
      • 15,510

      #3
      Originally posted by realheavyhands
      the selections dont make sense to be a "just title holder" he would have to be able to beat some of them guys
      Not really.

      Comment

      • -EX-
        Trading Block Tycoon
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2006
        • 21258
        • 720
        • 689
        • 32,678

        #4
        I don't know. Floyd would have trouble especially since he isn't a natural 147. I know people disagree but I think he could beat Duran.

        Comment

        • crold1
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2005
          • 6347
          • 324
          • 122
          • 19,304

          #5
          20 years ago is 1987 so this poll doesn't make sense. The Fab 4 was long gone from the ranges Floyd fights in. Floyd 20 years ago probably doesn't even go to 147 because Lloyd Honeyghan and Marlon Starling would have been too big for him he could have made a ton at 135 and 140. He'd be one of the best fighters in the world with an emerging Mike Tyson and Julio Cesar Chavez and he and Chavez or Whitaker would be budding superfights.

          Comment

          • crold1
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2005
            • 6347
            • 324
            • 122
            • 19,304

            #6
            Furthermore, he'd be good in any era after 1960 because the volume of fights could have been managable and he's still probably, best night for best night, the best ever at 130. Floyd would never have made it too far prior to that because his hands wouldn't have held up and the money would have forced him to fight too often. Can't have bad hands against Hank or Beau Jack.

            Comment

            • oldgringo
              Ellis
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jul 2004
              • 12747
              • 968
              • 453
              • 30,064

              #7
              Seeing as how those guys were fighting at 160 20 years ago....I think Floyd would be stomped.

              If he fought Hearns at 154 he'd be knocked out in 4 rounds or less.

              Hagler at 160? Fuhgetaboutit...

              His best shot would be against Duran at 154...but even that would be a rough outing. He would stand a chance in that one though as Duran was considerably slower as he moved up.

              Comment

              • crold1
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2005
                • 6347
                • 324
                • 122
                • 19,304

                #8
                Floyd today against Duran 1987 is a joke...he'd destroy THAT Duran and Roberto could weigh whatever he wants. Now Floyd 2002 v. Duran 1972 (the year each won the lightweight title)...Floyd gets stomped by that Duran.

                Now, if you put Floyd 25 years back in 1982...again, he doesn't go to 147 period. He stays at 30, 35 and 40 and he's still great. Camacho, Mancini, Arguello, Watt, Chacon, Limon, Boza...he beats them all. Pryor? Great fight but I lean to Aaron.

                Comment

                • Left2body
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2006
                  • 6200
                  • 269
                  • 277
                  • 13,212

                  #9
                  Crold1 those are some good insightful post........making me think.

                  Comment

                  • crold1
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2005
                    • 6347
                    • 324
                    • 122
                    • 19,304

                    #10
                    Call me Cliff. That goes for everybody.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP