This seems more ethical then Vitali v Ibeabuchi, as both are big punchers and 1 would have to fall eventually
Ibeabuchi V Peter
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Ike was better in almost every department. He had better handspeed, accuracy, stamina, not half as clumsy. Just a much classier, more talented fighter than Samuel Peter. The Ike who fought Tua would probably win by about 9 rounds to 3. The improved Ike with head movement takes a clean sweep and maybe even stops Peter.
We're not talking about a Wladimir Klitschko type fighter who will fight tentative, with all due respect to Klitschko. Ike would be hitting Peter with leather round after round, even taking some shots himself. Ike is the sort of guy the heavyweight division is crying out for; a fearless fighter with an indomitable will who throws huge shots and is willing to put it all on the line.
People can say what they want about people going overboard about him, but there's no one like him out there today. He was one hell of a specimen of a man, but a messed up individual.Comment
Comment