Why do some people pick others to win against Floyd?

[bdevils]

He's boring, so people want him to lose. He is the boring loser of this sport with an undefeated record.

you just don't appreciate skill. floyd is the most skillful fighter in the sport and the fact that alot of his fights isn't blood and guts turns alot of people off but the fact of the matter is this sport is called BOXING not slugging.

[-Antonio-]

He has flaws. Every fighter has flaws. There is just nobody good enough from this era that can exploit his flaws. Well Mosley could do it I think.

[The Troll]

Every time someone picks another boxer over Floyd, they are showing how ignorant they are about boxing or how biased against Floyd they are. People picking Margarito, Oscar, Cotto, Hatton, GATTI, Baldomir, etc, over him - why? What flaws in his technique has Floyd shown that could be exploited for a win? On what are you basing your predictions that will he lose to a certain fighter? The most frequent justification for predicting against him is that his opponent will "eventually catch him". I shouldn't even explain why this is ridiculous, but in every one his fights he is RARELY hit clean, and when he is, he's shown he can take it. So please, enlighten me - what are the flaws of the Mayweather style that can be exploited by other boxers in order to make him lose?

the audacity of those ****ers to predict somebody beating floyd. Never going to happen. dillisional ****tards.

[The Troll]

He can bullied and outworked by a stronger opponent that hits hard, somebody like Cotto. cerebral technical boxers like mosely and de la hoya wont beat him.

[2120]

"Every time someone picks another boxer over Floyd, they are showing how ignorant they are about boxing or how biased against Floyd they are. People picking Margarito, Oscar, Cotto, Hatton, GATTI, Baldomir, etc, over him - why? What flaws in his technique has Floyd shown that could be exploited for a win? On what are you basing your predictions that will he lose to a certain fighter? The most frequent justification for predicting against him is that his opponent will "eventually catch him". I shouldn't even explain why this is ridiculous, but in every one his fights he is RARELY hit clean, and when he is, he's shown he can take it. So please, enlighten me - what are the flaws of the Mayweather style that can be exploited by other boxers in order to make him lose?"

people picking margarito or clottey, williams, cintron, probably think they can beat or give mayweather a good fight because of there size mayweather hasnt face a big welterweight in his prime yet. mayweather lack of punch output and small stature would be his downfall against those opponents i mentioned above if they were able to beat him (because there diffently not going to out box him)

and of course they want him to lose and of course he is hated he claims to be the best ever!! and after his performance against oscar a not in this prime oscar he has no room to talk and then his match with baldimor he just coasted. a prime whitaker would have made it entertaining fighting a journey men u can hit at will. i was a big fan of mayweather before for the work he did at 130 and 135 but u call people haters i would call u a nutthugger if u can honestly say u were impressed by those performance

[squealpiggy]

"Every time someone picks another boxer over Floyd, they are showing how ignorant they are about boxing or how biased against Floyd they are. People picking Margarito, Oscar, Cotto, Hatton, GATTI, Baldomir, etc, over him - why? What flaws in his technique has Floyd shown that could be exploited for a win? On what are you basing your predictions that will he lose to a certain fighter? The most frequent justification for predicting against him is that his opponent will "eventually catch him". I shouldn't even explain why this is ridiculous, but in every one his fights he is RARELY hit clean, and when he is, he's shown he can take it. So please, enlighten me - what are the flaws of the Mayweather style that can be exploited by other boxers in order to make him lose?"

people picking margarito or clottey, williams, cintron, probably think they can beat or give mayweather a good fight because of there size mayweather hasnt face a big welterweight in his prime yet. mayweather lack of punch output and small stature would be his downfall against those opponents i mentioned above if they were able to beat him (because there diffently not going to out box him)

and of course they want him to lose and of course he is hated he claims to be the best ever!! and after his performance against oscar a not in this prime oscar he has no room to talk and then his match with baldimor he just coasted. a prime whitaker would have made it entertaining fighting a journey men u can hit at will. i was a big fan of mayweather before for the work he did at 130 and 135 but u call people haters i would call u a nutthugger if u can honestly say u were impressed by those performance

Lol ur just a h8er lol

Just kidding

[2120]

"Lol ur just a h8er lol

Just kidding "

the gigs up

[tito yuca]

He can bullied and outworked by a stronger opponent that hits hard, somebody like Cotto.

We don't know that because we haven't seen it; Cotto has never faced anyone half as good as Floyd. He might even lose against Zab, and even if he beats him, it does not say how he would do against Floyd, just check out Zab-Baldi and Baldi-Floyd.

people picking margarito or clottey, williams, cintron, probably think they can beat or give mayweather a good fight because of there size

Baldomir outweighed him by 14 pounds and Oscar by 17. I think it has been proven that he can beat bigger guys. And if you weren't aware, Oscar is more skillfull than all those you mentioned. Being bigger but considerably less skilled will NOT win you a fight against an expert tactitian like Floyd.

[oldgringo]

can't you pick another fighter over floyd because you're a fan of that other fighter? am i missing something?

[badnewsbrown]

cause i can, you ****** ****!

shut up u dutty ****a