Whitiker vs De La Hoya *must vote*

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • McAlister
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2006
    • 1978
    • 98
    • 3
    • 9,499

    #1

    Whitiker vs De La Hoya *must vote*

    This is a poll on who you think won their fight. Did DLH get the right decision or did Whitiker get robbed. Please vote if you have seen the fight and give your honest answer.Im making it simple just 2 choices its either he did or he didnt.
    86
    Whitiker was robbed.
    51.16%
    44
    De La Hoya no problems.
    48.84%
    42

    The poll is expired.

  • Kayo
    Walk's On Water
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2005
    • 3447
    • 165
    • 141
    • 10,929

    #2
    it was close, in a close fight its not really proper to call a fight a robbery

    Comment

    • EliteSoldier
      GOD
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Mar 2007
      • 5008
      • 335
      • 21
      • 5,251

      #3
      You know something, if people are going to call Whitiker/hola and Castillo/Mayweather close fights. Then why didn't the ******ed judges just give it a draw if both men deserved the win?

      Comment

      • Easy-E
        Gotta want it
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2005
        • 22686
        • 865
        • 1,739
        • 32,777

        #4
        Pernell deserved the nod IMO.

        Comment

        • -Hyperion-
          The Best And Fastest Ride
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2006
          • 14176
          • 912
          • 1,378
          • 35,380

          #5
          De la Hoya won that fight clearly in my opinion...i think i had it 115-112 for de la hoya...

          Comment

          • brently1979
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2007
            • 1226
            • 154
            • 441
            • 13,535

            #6
            I think DLH just got there. Whitaker running away isn't a good look.

            Comment

            • J Mac
              Not Too Serious
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Mar 2006
              • 687
              • 43
              • 144
              • 9,992

              #7
              Gotta be de la hoya, i thought it was a terrible fight where Whitiker seem content to just take the piss rather than throw a punch. How he can then wear the ****** look on his face afterwards when he hears the decsion is ridiculous. Whitiker blew it.

              Comment

              • jai mari078
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2006
                • 2935
                • 82
                • 0
                • 9,440

                #8
                Oscar won a close but decisive decision. I don't know how people can say Whittaker was robbed or won when all he did for the majority of the fight is run around and clown trying to win over judges.

                Comment

                • JAHamilton77
                  Banned
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 239
                  • 31
                  • 15
                  • 306

                  #9
                  Whitaker v De La Hoya?
                  Mayweather v Castillo?

                  Whats up with the fixation on the past, I could see if there was some new perspective in the initial post, or an in depth analysis after watching the fight again, but its like "Ok, who do you think won?" Isnt there a section on Boxing History?

                  So who won that Hagler v Leonard fight?

                  Comment

                  • !! Mr. Soprano
                    THE BOSS
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2005
                    • 7106
                    • 576
                    • 2,446
                    • 16,129

                    #10
                    Why would you put it down as two e*******..
                    Whitiker was robbed and De La Hoya no problems...
                    How about a close fight?

                    Robbed means he won the fight and it was a robbery, which it wasn't...
                    No Problem means he easily won, which he didn't...


                    It WAS a close fight and might have gone to Whitalker.... but I think DLH just pulled it off and being the younger fighter is who the judges favored..
                    Last edited by !! Mr. Soprano; 04-24-2007, 10:11 AM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP