This is a poll on who you think won their fight. Did DLH get the right decision or did Whitiker get robbed. Please vote if you have seen the fight and give your honest answer.Im making it simple just 2 choices its either he did or he didnt.
Whitiker vs De La Hoya *must vote*
Collapse
-
You know something, if people are going to call Whitiker/hola and Castillo/Mayweather close fights. Then why didn't the ******ed judges just give it a draw if both men deserved the win?Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Gotta be de la hoya, i thought it was a terrible fight where Whitiker seem content to just take the piss rather than throw a punch. How he can then wear the ****** look on his face afterwards when he hears the decsion is ridiculous. Whitiker blew it.Comment
-
Oscar won a close but decisive decision. I don't know how people can say Whittaker was robbed or won when all he did for the majority of the fight is run around and clown trying to win over judges.Comment
-
Whitaker v De La Hoya?
Mayweather v Castillo?
Whats up with the fixation on the past, I could see if there was some new perspective in the initial post, or an in depth analysis after watching the fight again, but its like "Ok, who do you think won?" Isnt there a section on Boxing History?
So who won that Hagler v Leonard fight?Comment
-
Why would you put it down as two e*******..
Whitiker was robbed and De La Hoya no problems...
How about a close fight?
Robbed means he won the fight and it was a robbery, which it wasn't...
No Problem means he easily won, which he didn't...
It WAS a close fight and might have gone to Whitalker.... but I think DLH just pulled it off and being the younger fighter is who the judges favored..Last edited by !! Mr. Soprano; 04-24-2007, 10:11 AM.Comment

Comment