And to what do you base your arguments my friend? We both know you cannot present arguments without stating solid basis. Now where's yours?
It is quite funny that you are one of the few remaining boxing fans who still think that PAC can be defeated by mere counter-punching and laid-back strategy.
If you base your arguments on their last fight, I advise you not to. One of the judge intentionally screwed his card and that is absolute evidence you cannot refute.
If you're pointing out that JMM "schooled" PAc from round 2 to 12, I also advise you not to go that way. Compubox clearly shows that all the rounds from round 2 to 12 were close with both boxers having their moments. The punch stats were close on most rounds that rounds were decided by mere 4-5 punch difference between the fighters. I have Compubox data to back up my claim.
Now what do you have?
If all you can present me are statements which states that JMM will pwn PAC without valid arguments and basis, I think you should try harder.
It is quite funny that you are one of the few remaining boxing fans who still think that PAC can be defeated by mere counter-punching and laid-back strategy.
If you base your arguments on their last fight, I advise you not to. One of the judge intentionally screwed his card and that is absolute evidence you cannot refute.
If you're pointing out that JMM "schooled" PAc from round 2 to 12, I also advise you not to go that way. Compubox clearly shows that all the rounds from round 2 to 12 were close with both boxers having their moments. The punch stats were close on most rounds that rounds were decided by mere 4-5 punch difference between the fighters. I have Compubox data to back up my claim.
Now what do you have?
If all you can present me are statements which states that JMM will pwn PAC without valid arguments and basis, I think you should try harder.
Comment