JMM will pound PAC's ASS!!!

[Joartcc3]

Rafael's chin is made of glass... end of story...

There are two possible scenarios which I see in a JMM-PAC fight.

Scenario no. 1. - JMM fights an aggresive and pressure type fight the way he fought MAB and I grudgingly admit he has a 50-50 chance of winning, maybe a KO late. By this time, EVERYONE must know that a 100% PAC CANNOT BE OUTBOXED. You have to attack and push him back like the way Morales did in the 1st fight.

Scenario no. 2.- JMM decided to return to his old counter-punching self and tries to lay back and wait for openings giving PAC the initiative. There is no doubt PAC will pick him apart and destroy him. By this time we should all know that laying back and giving PAC the initiative is the worst gameplan a boxer could do. He will figure you out and he will crack the shell you're hiding in.

[Joartcc3]

haha thats a nice one dude!

Nice sig. But then again, you're a crab. Get a life.

[macman]

"By this time, EVERYONE must know that a 100% PAC CANNOT BE OUTBOXED."

Utter bull.

JMM did it it the first time for 10 rounds, & Morales a more aggressive version in his first.

Pacquiao's not a boxer, he's an instinctive fighter with great speed & power.

Don't know if JMM still has the reactions to pull it off the 2nd time, but he's still got better boxing skills than Pacquiao.

[SalvaDominicano]

im not a floyd fan i like pac its just wish these other pac fans would stop thinking hes unstoppable.

[Gareth Ivanovic]

JMM would give Pac his toughest competition IMO and would solve for the moment who the best is in the Super Featherweight division is. JMM showed in their first fight the formula to beat Pac, but Pac has gotten better since then. I see JMM challenging Pac, but Pac's speed, power, heart and determination would prevail in the end. Either late round KO or close SD.

[gixxer]

There are two possible scenarios which I see in a JMM-PAC fight.

Scenario no. 1. - JMM fights an aggresive and pressure type fight the way he fought MAB and I grudgingly admit he has a 50-50 chance of winning, maybe a KO late. By this time, EVERYONE must know that a 100% PAC CANNOT BE OUTBOXED. You have to attack and push him back like the way Morales did in the 1st fight.

Scenario no. 2.- JMM decided to return to his old counter-punching self and tries to lay back and wait for openings giving PAC the initiative. There is no doubt PAC will pick him apart and destroy him. By this time we should all know that laying back and giving PAC the initiative is the worst gameplan a boxer could do. He will figure you out and he will crack the shell you're hiding in.

get pacs **** out your ass **** ryder

[Joartcc3]

get pacs **** out your ass **** ryder

Is that all you can say dude? If that's all you're ignorant mind can produce, then it's a shame if you ever went to school as you seem to lack a brain.

Now that you've said your trash talk, back it up with your arguments. If not shut up dude.

[Joartcc3]

JMM would give Pac his toughest competition IMO and would solve for the moment who the best is in the Super Featherweight division is. JMM showed in their first fight the formula to beat Pac, but Pac has gotten better since then. I see JMM challenging Pac, but Pac's speed, power, heart and determination would prevail in the end. Either late round KO or close SD.

JMM has a good chance to win, in fact he can KO PAC. But if he thinks he can win by laying back and giving PAC the initiative, then it will be an early night for him. JMM has proven he can stun PAC, but it is the great Morales who has shown the blueprint on how to beat PAC, that is, attack and push him back. Lay low and wait and you will be figured out and destroyed.

PAC's true strength is his sense of initiative, once he sees an opening he goes for it and his skills enable him to negate certain standard laws of boxing (jabs are useless against PAC). Anyways true greats does.

[Joartcc3]

"By this time, EVERYONE must know that a 100% PAC CANNOT BE OUTBOXED."

Utter bull.

JMM did it it the first time for 10 rounds, & Morales a more aggressive version in his first.

Pacquiao's not a boxer, he's an instinctive fighter with great speed & power.

Don't know if JMM still has the reactions to pull it off the 2nd time, but he's still got better boxing skills than Pacquiao.

What's your evidence to point that out?

Aside from THE FACT THAT THE JUDGE SCREWED THE DECISION, you don't have any basis aside from what you're saying.

Compubox states that all the rounds were close. JMM got the middle rounds but PAC rallied in the later rounds.

Most of the rounds were won with a fighter scoring 3-5 more punches than the other. I have compubox as my evidence. What do you have as your basis? Now if you can't present something which can overturn a compubox data, then you better put up as you are basically stating arguments which mean nothing.

[gixxer]

JMM has a good chance to win, in fact he can KO PAC. But if he thinks he can win by laying back and giving PAC the initiative, then it will be an early night for him. JMM has proven he can stun PAC, but it is the great Morales who has shown the blueprint on how to beat PAC, that is, attack and push him back. Lay low and wait and you will be figured out and destroyed.

PAC's true strength is his sense of initiative, once he sees an opening he goes for it and his skills enable him to negate certain standard laws of boxing (jabs are useless against PAC). Anyways true greats does.

lol..........marquez can lay back and catch the dumb ass coming in off balance like he always is.........others may not be able to but my friend jmm is just that great of a fighter that he can.....................