Barrera claims he was ROBBED!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Addison
    THE COLDEST
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 19097
    • 2,375
    • 4,510
    • 27,222

    #1

    Barrera claims he was ROBBED!

    Reported by local Los Angeles channel 7 ABC Sports 11:26pm PST.

    (Nice to see highlights of the fight on the networks)

    Barrera claimed he was robbed.

    I guess that means REMATCH.


    They started the fight with gentlemanly respect.

    It hasn't ended that way.
  • kadyo's
    Grand Son
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2004
    • 23628
    • 2,648
    • 3,802
    • 56,474

    #2
    The decision could have gone either way. If barrera means it should have been a smaller margin then I have to agree.

    Comment

    • Papa Ace
      Bumibira Kahit Kurbada
      • Jan 2006
      • 0
      • 228
      • 197
      • 22,142

      #3
      barrera was robbed a few rounds in the decision but not the fight.

      the sucker punch was even enough reason for him to lose it.

      he may have also lost a few million dollars with a rematch with marquez. JMM would be the main man now.

      Comment

      • karlobarlo
        Up and Comer
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Sep 2006
        • 91
        • 9
        • 0
        • 6,338

        #4
        Originally posted by Papa Ace
        barrera was robbed a few rounds in the decision but not the fight.

        the sucker punch was even enough reason for him to lose it.

        he may have also lost a few million dollars with a rematch with marquez. JMM would be the main man now.
        Get the **** outa here dude.....seriously!!! If the sucker puch was enough reason for him to lose should PAC have also lost???????? I mean he did exactly the same thing on his third Knockdown against Marquez!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        Comment

        • kadyo's
          Grand Son
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2004
          • 23628
          • 2,648
          • 3,802
          • 56,474

          #5
          Originally posted by karlobarlo
          Get the **** outa here dude.....seriously!!! If the sucker puch was enough reason for him to lose should PAC have also lost???????? I mean he did exactly the same thing on his third Knockdown against Marquez!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
          Why can't you stop crying about pac? LMFAO pac this and pac that pac blah blah blah

          Comment

          • moochi
            We need one organization!
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2004
            • 3444
            • 378
            • 60
            • 26,344

            #6
            Originally posted by kadyo
            Why can't you stop crying about pac? LMFAO pac this and pac that pac blah blah blah
            anybody who hits a man like that, whilst on all fours should be DQ'd...

            Comment

            • realheavyhands
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jul 2004
              • 4519
              • 107
              • 0
              • 11,370

              #7
              Originally posted by moochi
              anybody who hits a man like that, whilst on all fours should be DQ'd...
              only problem is he looked at the ref to credit the knock down and nady was in lala land...he did what any fighter is suppoed to do

              Comment

              • pokpok
                **** KING
                • Apr 2004
                • 0
                • 13
                • 7
                • 6,549

                #8
                Originally posted by karlobarlo
                Get the **** outa here dude.....seriously!!! If the sucker puch was enough reason for him to lose should PAC have also lost???????? I mean he did exactly the same thing on his third Knockdown against Marquez!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                I think he meant on how close the fight was...MAB's punch while JMM was down could have cost him the fight if the judges were scoring the fight correctly.

                Comment

                • ceboxer15
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Feb 2005
                  • 976
                  • 33
                  • 11
                  • 8,495

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Addison
                  Reported by local Los Angeles channel 7 ABC Sports 11:26pm PST.

                  (Nice to see highlights of the fight on the networks)

                  Barrera claimed he was robbed.

                  I guess that means REMATCH.


                  They started the fight with gentlemanly respect.

                  It hasn't ended that way.
                  the rematch has already been signed for September, look on boxrec.

                  Comment

                  • karlobarlo
                    Up and Comer
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Sep 2006
                    • 91
                    • 9
                    • 0
                    • 6,338

                    #10
                    Originally posted by pokpok
                    I think he meant on how close the fight was...MAB's punch while JMM was down could have cost him the fight if the judges were scoring the fight correctly.

                    Yeah thats what I meant dude......I probably should have put it better! Just saying that it was closer than people are saying! Great fight I thought!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP