Barrera claims he was ROBBED!

**kadyo's** · 03-18-2007, 01:33 AM

The decision could have gone either way. If barrera means it should have been a smaller margin then I have to agree.

**Papa Ace** · 03-18-2007, 01:41 AM

barrera was robbed a few rounds in the decision but not the fight.

the sucker punch was even enough reason for him to lose it.

he may have also lost a few million dollars with a rematch with marquez. JMM would be the main man now.

**karlobarlo** · 03-18-2007, 01:45 AM

Originally posted by Papa Ace

barrera was robbed a few rounds in the decision but not the fight.

the sucker punch was even enough reason for him to lose it.

he may have also lost a few million dollars with a rematch with marquez. JMM would be the main man now.

Get the **** outa here dude.....seriously!!! If the sucker puch was enough reason for him to lose should PAC have also lost???????? I mean he did exactly the same thing on his third Knockdown against Marquez!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

**kadyo's** · 03-18-2007, 01:46 AM

Originally posted by karlobarlo

Get the **** outa here dude.....seriously!!! If the sucker puch was enough reason for him to lose should PAC have also lost???????? I mean he did exactly the same thing on his third Knockdown against Marquez!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why can't you stop crying about pac? LMFAO pac this and pac that pac blah blah blah

**moochi** · 03-18-2007, 02:41 AM

Originally posted by kadyo

Why can't you stop crying about pac? LMFAO pac this and pac that pac blah blah blah

anybody who hits a man like that, whilst on all fours should be DQ'd...

**realheavyhands** · 03-18-2007, 02:45 AM

Originally posted by moochi

anybody who hits a man like that, whilst on all fours should be DQ'd...

only problem is he looked at the ref to credit the knock down and nady was in lala land...he did what any fighter is suppoed to do

**pokpok** · 03-18-2007, 02:46 AM

Originally posted by karlobarlo

Get the **** outa here dude.....seriously!!! If the sucker puch was enough reason for him to lose should PAC have also lost???????? I mean he did exactly the same thing on his third Knockdown against Marquez!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think he meant on how close the fight was...MAB's punch while JMM was down could have cost him the fight if the judges were scoring the fight correctly.

**ceboxer15** · 03-18-2007, 08:22 AM

Originally posted by Addison

Reported by local Los Angeles channel 7 ABC Sports 11:26pm PST.

(Nice to see highlights of the fight on the networks)

Barrera claimed he was robbed.

I guess that means REMATCH.

They started the fight with gentlemanly respect.

It hasn't ended that way.

the rematch has already been signed for September, look on boxrec.

**karlobarlo** · 03-18-2007, 08:56 AM

Originally posted by pokpok

I think he meant on how close the fight was...MAB's punch while JMM was down could have cost him the fight if the judges were scoring the fight correctly.

Yeah thats what I meant dude......I probably should have put it better! Just saying that it was closer than people are saying! Great fight I thought!

Barrera claims he was ROBBED!