Floyd Mayweather vs. Sugar Ray Robinson?

[mikec]

For me this is a total no brainer. If you do your research the way you're supposed to - BoxRec - you'll see that Robinson lost 19 of his bouts. Floyd hasn't lost one yet, nor come close to losing, so that instantly puts him ahead.

Not only that, but Robinson lost to the likes of Jack LaMotta... Floyd's just UD'd Carlos Baldomir, something Robinson never did.

I've put some options down as to what the outcome would be. However, I've not included a KO victory for Robinson as it's pointless - he wouldn't have the power to hurt Floyd, so why bother? The only way I can see it happening outright is if Floyd slipped on the canvas and accidentally hit him low, causing a DQ. But that's not likely.

Just look at the stats, they speak for themselves. Easy UD or early KO victory for Floyd - it'd be like Floyd vs. Gatti all over again.

Are you serious? Robinson would embarrass PBF. Robinson fought insane competetion compared to PBF and on top of it he fought every ****in month. Keep spiking your tea over there guy

[Underboss]

Are you serious? Robinson would embarrass PBF. Robinson fought insane competetion compared to PBF and on top of it he fought every ****in month. Keep spiking your tea over there guy

he wasnt serious, he just wanted to create this thread to see us complain about it

[wdl1]

Sugar is on just about everyone`s p4p list. He had a great chin,fought everyone,lost most of his fights when he was older. Stands to reason he would have wiped the floor with Mayweather. Floyd couldn`t stop him, only advantage he would have,speed. Robinson one puch power,reach height,tremedous ring savvy. And he could dig down and go to war when he had to. And Sugar was really a true welter. He had too many tools,and a willingness to put himself out there and dominate. Not try to win safely.It took a big middleweight (Lamotta) to get to him at first.

[omegamale]

boxers back then didnt have the skills to compete now. everything evolves with time. i doubt srr would even be a contender now. most of you guys never even seen him fight and you just say he's the best because so many others did. get your own opinions. so what he fought anyone. that doesnt make you special. theirs no way a fighter with 19 losses should be considered p4p best fighter ever. think with logic not with your hearts. an example of a modern day srr would be emmanuel agustus. he fights everyone and has had a lot of wars. does that make him great? a fighter will never be considered great until he losses i guess.

[realheavyhands]

robinson is unbeatable a 147.. and you know who is simalar to robinson , in style judah and he gave mayweather hell for a third of that fight and knocked him down, robinson knows all the tricks can turn it on and off like a switch audahs just a spaz .. mayweather wouldnt no what to do .. im tellin u

[squealpiggy]

boxers back then didnt have the skills to compete now. everything evolves with time. i doubt srr would even be a contender now. most of you guys never even seen him fight and you just say he's the best because so many others did. get your own opinions. so what he fought anyone. that doesnt make you special. theirs no way a fighter with 19 losses should be considered p4p best fighter ever. think with logic not with your hearts. an example of a modern day srr would be emmanuel agustus. he fights everyone and has had a lot of wars. does that make him great? a fighter will never be considered great until he losses i guess.

This has to be another joke post! Emmanuel Augustus is the same as Sugar Ray Robinson? Awesome.

[CoLd_WaVE]

Classic Anorak Thread.....