The real question here should be; Does the WBC have the right to grant Maskaev another optional defense because its a unification bout or should they have to honor the title shot they have allready granted Peter?
Well, you say.. why not grant Peter a title shot to the winner of Maskaev-Klitschko? The problem with this is Sam Peter would have to wait for: 1) Maskaev and Klitschko figh and; 2) then he would have for wait at least another 3 months for the winner of that fight to get ready. Bottonline is he's out for anywhere from 5-8 months depending on circumstances out of his control.
Why should he wait all this time and perhaps lose some of his momentum after his inspiring performance against JT?
My opinion is that the WBC should force Maskaev to face his mandatory since Maskaev has already had an optional defense and that Peter has had to fight 2 eliminator bouts to get his shot.
Well, you say.. why not grant Peter a title shot to the winner of Maskaev-Klitschko? The problem with this is Sam Peter would have to wait for: 1) Maskaev and Klitschko figh and; 2) then he would have for wait at least another 3 months for the winner of that fight to get ready. Bottonline is he's out for anywhere from 5-8 months depending on circumstances out of his control.
Why should he wait all this time and perhaps lose some of his momentum after his inspiring performance against JT?
My opinion is that the WBC should force Maskaev to face his mandatory since Maskaev has already had an optional defense and that Peter has had to fight 2 eliminator bouts to get his shot.
Comment