Calzaghe.. he proves me wrong

[hugh grant]

He went 121-9, but I know he had six losses on his record before he won his first ABA title (1985 Schoolboy's in Derby).

Thanks you know it all. Pretty good amatuer record as well as professional.

[OldBoxingFan]

Calzaghe has that bad case of inconcistency. He can look great one fight then almost blo it the next. We seen it with Mitchell,Bika and many others, he just doesnt bring it every fight and i dont know why. But if he only gets up for competitionthen he should do fine cause from here on out hes probably only gonna be in big fights.

[Liaison]

He can look great one fight then almost blo it the next. We seen it with Mitchell,Bika and many others, he just doesnt bring it every fight and i dont know why.

Bad in the Mitchell fight? Really?

Byron had just lost to Ottke despite winning 8 rounds with ease. He was supposedly pissed and a couple reports suggested he was annihilating guys at heavier than himself in sparing. One tabloid was reporting of Joe tremendous hand problems (this tabloid, though i can't remember which one, was the only one that mention Joe had problems before the bout) which it said would “eliminate all chances of Joe getting an unlikely KO victory” (Remember, Byron had a great chin amplified from one of the Siaca bouts) and yet he still made him look a fool after Byron knocked him down in the 2nd.

For me, that fight is a lot more impressive than both the Eubank and Lacy performances…

[OldBoxingFan]

But he still almost got Ko'd. Lacy hits way harder then Mitchell and look what happened. Now you get what im saying?