Again my opinion, JCC is prominent in my memory as is RJJ so......where I had close decisions to make I used my personal experiences of a fighter instead of basing my opinion purely on what someone else has written about a fighter.
No bad, nice to see Matthew Franklin on the list!!, I debated but he is on the top 75 of my list Camamcho at 46 might be a little to early for him on mine...Chuvalo...maybe not....Foster at 42 to low, the most dominant LHW...deserve higher...
Foster for me was a great fighter hence he is on the list but I feel the LHW division has been a weaker division throughout therefore that's where I see him!
You can ask that about many of my choices but that's the point there my choices!
The featherweight division in my opinion has not been blessed with the standard of fighters throughout so therefore I have rated Pep at 21. But as I say its only my opinion.
Its interesting that you noticed Pep's position but did not mention that Sandy Saddler is at 39 even though he was arguably as good as Pep, indeed he stopped Pep three times but lost once on points so.....its interpretation.
I can only take 1 explaination at a time with that list.
Tweet
Comment