If Mayweather beats De La Hoya..

[Sin City]

He started at light fly weight when he was 16. Mayweather at 16 was also a light fly weight. So it doesn't really matter.

Against Oscar Mayweather was 148 come fight night. Pacman was 148 against Oscar as well.

BUT
Oscar was over 160 against Floyd. Oscar was 147 against Pacman. How could Floyd stop a healthy Oscar in his best weight. Tito didn't, Mosley didn't and many other failed when Oscar fought at his healthy weight

when Mayweather was 21 he was at super featherweight... when Pacquiao was 21 he was at flyweight/super bantam. Your argument fails. (kids develop at different rates.. when you are 21 your body stays where it'll most likely be for the rest of your life.. though you will continue to add weight.)

Anyway, let me ask you.. do you still give Margarito the same credit for beating Cotto the way he did IF he is found guilty of using illegal wraps??

The same goes with the respect I gave Floyd, which he got more respect from me at one point. AFTER the De La Hoya fight though he chose to fight a junior welterweight and duck ALL the top names at WW. Then when the competition got tough and he was in a position where he needed to fight the best or get rediculed he retired.. so should he get the same respect from me??

HELL NO!



That's why I'm laughing at y'all right now.. bringing up statements from 2006.
You haven't even been around this forum since 2009 and a lot goes on betwen then and now. That's like someone saying why didn't you attack Afghanistan pre-9/11.. ugh, cus **** hadn't happened yet.

[Sugar May Floyd]

when Mayweather was 21 he was at super featherweight... when Pacquiao was 21 he was at flyweight/super bantam. You argument fails.

May be because Pacman filled out later than Floyd.

What about Pacman at 135 weighs the same as Floyd at 147.

Pacman fought Oscar at the age of 30. Mayweather fought Oscar at age of 30. Both weight the exact weight come fight night.

Anyway, let me ask you.. do you still give Margarito the same credit for beating Cotto the way he did IF he is found guilty of using illegal wraps??

YES. Since he did not cheat against Cotto and was cleared for that fight

The same goes with the respect I gave Floyd, which he got more respect from me at one point. AFTER the De La Hoya fight though he chose to fight a junior welterweight and duck ALL the top names at WW.
HELL NO!

A junior WW that you choose to BEAT Mayweather. how ironic

What excuse you have now?? Hatton is small at WW??

Mayweather started at 130. Hatton outweighs Floyd. Hatton was a P4P fighter at the time top 5.

Will you say oh the Collazo fight proved it. Funny how you tipped Hatton to win.

That's why I'm laughing at y'all right now.. bringing up statements from 2006.
You haven't even been around this forum since 2009 and a lot goes on betwen then and now. That's like someone saying why didn't you attack Afghanistan pre-9/11.. ugh, cus **** hadn't happened yet.

Again I did not bump this thread. I clicked on it and laughed at your statement that makes you look like a hater and a idiot

[Sin City]

May be because Pacman filled out later than Floyd.

What about Pacman at 135 weighs the same as Floyd at 147.

Pacman fought Oscar at the age of 30. Mayweather fought Oscar at age of 30. Both weight the exact weight come fight night.


YES. Since he did not cheat against Cotto and was cleared for that fight



A junior WW that you choose to BEAT Mayweather. how ironic

What excuse you have now?? Hatton is small at WW??

Mayweather started at 130. Hatton outweighs Floyd. Hatton was a P4P fighter at the time top 5.

Will you say oh the Collazo fight proved it. Funny how you tipped Hatton to win.


Again I did not bump this thread. I clicked on it and laughed at your statement that makes you look like a hater and a idiot

Please show me where I said Hatton would beat Mayweather!!
Please do.. because I said Mayweather would beat Hatton.
Didn't think it would be as easy as he did.. but I thought it would be by UD.

[Sugar May Floyd]

Please show me where I said Hatton would beat Mayweather!!
Please do.. because I said Mayweather would beat Hatton.
Didn't think it would be as easy as he did.. but I thought it would be by UD.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=233037&referrerid=118774

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=5825

There you go.

You voted Hatton to beat Mayweather..

What's your excuse. I accidentally clicked on Hatton

[Sin City]

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...errerid=118774

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=5825

There you go.

You voted Hatton to beat Mayweather..

What's your excuse. I accidentally clicked on Hatton

Since you know a ton about me and know how to look up my own posts better then I do.. Please find the thread pre-hatton fight where I said that if he somehow managed to beat floyd "I would **** a brick". I bet you won't because it only disproves you.

[Guest]

Well Mayweather retired in his prime, so this thread is pointless.

[Sin City]

here you go:

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=151155

weaks before the Hatton Mayweather fight..

The people who want to see good fights not one sided beatings over smaller opponents.

Yup, I sure was saying Ricky was gone win...

[Sugar May Floyd]

here you go:

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=151155

weaks before the Hatton Mayweather fight..




Yup, I sure was saying Ricky was gone win...

And??

You voted for Hatton to win

Is that all you got?? LOL

[Sin City]

And??

You voted for Hatton to win

Is that all you got?? LOL

No.. the question is, is that all you got?
I already disproved you by posting the thread..
you really want to say that I thought Hatton was gonna win, the burden of proof is on you.. so please, by all means go ahead and posts more statements where I said this would happen.. Prove me wrong.

I guarantee you wont.

"The people who want to see good fights not one sided beatings over smaller opponents." - Me.
yup, I sure did think Hatton was gonna win.

[Sin City]

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=138792&page=3