Can non-threshold susbtances have threshold type tests

[ADP02]

OK, so you meant yes, the document is ALL in scope.


You also said this in your initial statements and bolded and highlighted some sections:




So in your post to the judges, you said that there were no threshold criteria AT ALL. Even at the bottom of that, you said the same.

1) So why were YOU telling the judges REMOVE from the SCOPE some criteria mentioned in the document?


Does that not contradict what you have been crying about until now and admitting to it as well?


NOBODY AGREED to remove SCREENING TEST. Heck, I even had it on the statement that YOU AGREED to. In fact, above you mention that you do not see threshold type criteria AT ALL. You even mention, NOT EXCLUDE it!!!!


"AT ALL" = You do not see any reference to that type of test ANYWHERE.




2) You tried to remove from SCOPE, RATIOs/SCORE ….. but that too was right there in your opening statement to the judges!!!!


What gives?



There is a difference in stating why it is not correct and trying to convince people, it just is NOT IN SCOPE, BECAUSE Travestyny says so. ….. NOT because we ACTUALLY AGREED TO THAT EXCLUSION!!!!


You ARGUED for pages. Once you saw that you were mistaken, you decided that your only way out is to say, NOT IN SCOPE. BUT READ YOUR STATEMENT ABOVE!!!!

.


.

NOPE.

The statements, according to you, were relevant enough to post it to the judges!

The statements were posted AGAIN by you over 2 months ago. You had a reason for that but then slowly realized that you are falling into something that you cannot handle.

Then came the CHALLENGE. Well, it is on something that we discussed for 2 months and this argument was actually started 1.5 years ago.

So this is very relevant!!!


BUT there is a BONUS to this one.

a) I KNOW THAT YOU ARE GOING TO DUCK!!!! ONLY if you didn't DUCK, could you have proven me wrong.

CHECKMATE!!!



b) You helped out by being ready to get the judges if it was any other challenge but, GULP, NOT for this one!!!


c) You couldn't win either way but you did what I expected. YOU DUCKED!!!!


ONLY the DUCKER does not want it to be relevant!!!!

DUCKING at a CHALLENGE that he got votes on

and now

DUCKING on questions!!!!


I see a pattern!!!

LET ME TEACH YOU A LESSON BlTCH.


CHECKMATE is me having you beat in every direction you've turned.

CHECKMATE is me exposing all of your lies in here.

CHECKMATE is having you beg me to give you a handicap because you couldn't overcome my information

CHECKMATE is having you claim you were cheated but refusing a rematch over and over and over again!

CHECKMATE IS THIS:

4-0!!!!!!

The ONLY thing that I wanted to PROVE was PROVEN!!!


We are CLOSE to 60 pages. There was NO CONFIDENCE, NO WILL, it was an EASY CHECKMATE.


ALL you did was say,
"I want any CHALLENGE but THIS ONE"



It's simple.
I EXPECTED YOU to DUCK!!!!

60 pages later, you STILL
DUCKED!!!!



To me and everyone BUT Travestyny, that is a




CHECKMATE!!!







BUT LET's CONFIRM.

Travestyny, DO YOU ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE?


NO!!!!






.

[travestyny]

4-0!!!!!!

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

ADP ON SUICIDE ALERT. JUST DO IT!!!!!
YOU WILL NEVER LIVE DOWN THAT 4-0 LOSS!

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/pUeXcg80cO8I8/*****.gif[/IMG]

[travestyny]

the only thing that i wanted to prove was proven!!!
.

oh what did you prove. That you would even duck when your f@g friend spoon tried to get you to accept a challenge and worked to set it up for you.


bahahahahahahahaha. You let your boyfriend downnnnnn!!!!!!!!!

do you accept or not???????? Fvvcking accept and let's get it over with!

no!!!

[travestyny]

BUT LET's CONFIRM.

Travestyny, DO YOU ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE?


NO!!!!






.

ADP. DID YOU SAY THIS:

2) WHILE OUT OF SCOPE, this specific criteria had an "and/OR" in which the panel was describing. In that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using EPO, it can be used.

ONE OF THE MAIN POINTS THAT I TOLD YOU WHEN YOU TRIED THIS GAME A YEAR AGO. BUT I DIDN'T KNOW THAT YOU CONFIRMED IT. LMAOOOOO



YOU MUST HAVE FELT REALLY ****** WHEN I FOUND THAT, DIDN'T YOU???

OH THAT'S RIGHT. YOU THOUGHT IT WAS ALTERED. DO YOU WANT ME TO LINK YOU TO IT AGAIN! BHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA


YOU CAN'T WIN, BlTCH. YOU COULD NEVER WIN. YOU ARE FAR TOO DUMB!!!!!!!!!

[travestyny]

AWWW. WELL I GUESS THAT'S IT, HUH ADP02 Better luck next deflection!

ADP02'S OWN POSTS THAT DESTROYED HIM!

1.

2) WHILE OUT OF SCOPE, this specific criteria had an "and/OR" in which the panel was describing. In that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using EPO, it can be used.

2.

4) Billeau2 and Zaroku understood that after we made our statements that we were at that point in time establishing what was the scope and anything that we are disagreeing with.

6) You asked me a question ..... I stated NOT ONCE BUT TWICE THE SCOPE

3.

We both said stuff BEFORE the initial statement. Was there an agreement at that point? NOT REALLY.

4.

SCOPE that YOU agreed on: Does the EPO technical document refer to threshold criteria?

CLAIMING THIS WASN'T ABOUT MAYWEATHER'S IV!
5.

You said thresholds are not a factor for Floyd but that is not an accurate statement.

So if GC/MS or whatever measures EPO values below a threshold, as an example, due to a 6 hour delay and drinking fluids plus an IV that diluted the urine sample just enough.
.

6.

DO YOU ACCEPT OR NOT???????? FVVCKING ACCEPT AND LET'S GET IT OVER WITH!

NO!!!

YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED YOU LYING SCUMBAG. POSTS 1-5 YOU'VE BEEN BLATANTLY LYING ABOUT BECAUSE YOU KNOW THEY DESTROY YOU. YOU HAVE NO CHANCE OF WINNING A REMATCH, AND THAT'S WHY YOU DECLINED. PAY ME THE POINTS THAT YOU OWE YOU SCUMBAG!

4-0!!!!!!

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

[img]https://media.*****.com/media/3o7qDSOvfaCO9b3MlO/*****.gif[/IMG]

....but ADP02 STILL BE LIKE:

[ADP02]

ADP. DID YOU SAY THIS:





ONE OF THE MAIN POINTS THAT I TOLD YOU WHEN YOU TRIED THIS GAME A YEAR AGO. BUT I DIDN'T KNOW THAT YOU CONFIRMED IT. LMAOOOOO



YOU MUST HAVE FELT REALLY ****** WHEN I FOUND THAT, DIDN'T YOU???

OH THAT'S RIGHT. YOU THOUGHT IT WAS ALTERED. DO YOU WANT ME TO LINK YOU TO IT AGAIN! BHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA


YOU CAN'T WIN, BlTCH. YOU COULD NEVER WIN. YOU ARE FAR TOO DUMB!!!!!!!!!

4-0!!!!!!

ADP ON SUICIDE ALERT. JUST DO IT!!!!!
YOU WILL NEVER LIVE DOWN THAT 4-0 LOSS!

oh what did you prove. That you would even duck when your f@g friend spoon tried to get you to accept a challenge and worked to set it up for you.


bahahahahahahahaha. You let your boyfriend downnnnnn!!!!!!!!!

AWWW. WELL I GUESS THAT'S IT, HUH ADP02 Better luck next deflection!

ADP02'S OWN POSTS THAT DESTROYED HIM!

1.

2.



3.

4.

CLAIMING THIS WASN'T ABOUT MAYWEATHER'S IV!
5.

6.



[/CENTER]

YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED YOU LYING SCUMBAG. POSTS 1-5 YOU'VE BEEN BLATANTLY LYING ABOUT BECAUSE YOU KNOW THEY DESTROY YOU. YOU HAVE NO CHANCE OF WINNING A REMATCH, AND THAT'S WHY YOU DECLINED. PAY ME THE POINTS THAT YOU OWE YOU SCUMBAG!

4-0!!!!!!

....but ADP02 STILL BE LIKE:

Every post, I come back and shoot your out of context posts or your misinterpretations!!!

I ask you simple questions and YOU DUCK!!!!
It is becoming a bad habit!!!




I told you to look for it but I guess you do not want. This was from that same thread

ADP02

but I also found the original agreement which includes the example that even T/E which is just a SCREENING test is acceptable!!!! What did you say? Did you accept?

....... YOU said "Yes, I'm fine with it."


The above is very clear ...... I asked you specifically what "I'm IN" for and are YOU OK with that ...... YOU said, "I'm FINE"



Whenever you strayed away from the scope, I tried my best to tell you to stay in scope ..... Main reason is that it would get too confusing for everyone else and to keep it simple.

There you go!!!

You couldn't find that, could you!!!


DUCKER!!!!





Travestyny, you want to ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE?

"NO!!!"

[travestyny]

SO....YOU DON'T WANT A REMATCH....BUT YOU WANT TO DEFLECT TO SOMETHING YOU SAID WAS OUT OF SCOPE AND IRRELEVANT....AND YOU WANT ME TO FORGET THAT YOU SAID THOSE THINGS????

3) WHILE OUT OF SCOPE, as I mentioned in point 2 above, the additional evidence would come from SDSPAGE Method in which ALSO has a threshold criteria test related to the calculated MOLECULAR MASS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So to say, while irrelevant, it would not make a difference!!!!!

ADP DEFLECTING????? WELL THAT'S LIKE CLOCKWORK, ISN'T IT. BUT WHO KNEW THAT HE LIES AS MUCH AS HE DEFLECTS!!!!!

4-0!!!!!!

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

PAY YOUR DEBT SCUMBAG!!!!

[travestyny]

Every post, I come back and shoot your out of context posts or your misinterpretations!!!

I ask you simple questions and YOU DUCK!!!!
It is becoming a bad habit!!!




I told you to look for it but I guess you do not want. This was from that same thread




There you go!!!

You couldn't find that, could you!!!


DUCKER!!!!





Travestyny, you want to ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE?

WHAT'S HYSTERICAL IS THAT YOU DON'T WANT THE CHALLENGE. LMAOOOOOOOOOO.


YOU WANT A DEFLECTION!!!!!!!!!!


WHAT'S THE MATTER, ADP. YOU COULDN'T HANDLE IT THAT YOU SAID IT WAS OUT OF SCOPE AND IRRELEVANT. LMAOOOOOOOO!!!!

DO YOU ACCEPT OR NOT???????? FVVCKING ACCEPT AND LET'S GET IT OVER WITH!

NO!!!

"NO!!!"

I'M GOING TO CLOWN YOU EVERYWHERE YOU GO. LMAOOOOOOOO. JUST LIKE I PROMISED WHEN YOU FIRST GOT YOUR ASS BEAT 4-0.

[travestyny]

YOU ARE STILL CRYING ABOUT THIS SHlT? UNBELIEVABLE!

DO YOU WANT A REMATCH? YES OR NO? YOU KEEP WRITING ME ESSAYS BUT YOU BACKED DOWN.


SO TELL ME NOW.


1. REMATCH
2. JUDGES LISTEN TO EVIDENCE OF THE SCOPE
3. OFFICIAL INITIAL STATEMENTS REMAIN
4. PERMANENT BAN
5. ALL POINTS.
6. PAY YOUR WAY IN BY PAYING OFF THE DEBT YOU ALREADY OWE SO YOU DON'T WELCH TWICE.



LAST FVVCKING TIME BlTCH. YOUR CRYING IS EPIC...AND BORING ALREADY. YOU'RE FLOODING THIS FVVCKING ROOM WITH TEARS.

AND THE DESPERATE SHlT YOU ARE SAYING ABOVE IS LAUGHABLE. LMAOOOOOOO. GIVE THE FVVCK UP!!!!!

NOOOOO ANSWER FROM ADP. BUT HE CLAIMS I CHEATED HIM. LMAOOOOOOOO.

4-0!!!!!!

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

[img]https://media.*****.com/media/hroV3K17Bodoc/source.gif[/img]

[travestyny]

Well, that was fun. 50+ pages of you deflecting to something you yourself called out of scope and irrelevant. 50+ pages of you lying saying that it was actually in scope. When I proved you yourself said it was out of scope, and all of your lies about exactly what the scope was, you conveniently dropped the rematch and wanted me to just forget that you said it was out of scope and irrelevant.


Don't worry little guy. I'm going to leave you alone now. I'd clown you more, but I'm actually quite busy nowadays. No time to keep kicking the shlt out of you.


Real talk. You should pay that debt. You know you lost and it was legit. That's why you refused the rematch. Better luck next time. Too bad you're going to have to choke on that 4-0 loss forever.


So long. Don't worry, you'll always be my 4-0 loser bltch.

4-0!!!!!!

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

R.I.P.