Can non-threshold susbtances have threshold type tests

[travestyny]

Travestyny,

the CHALLENGE is on your misinterpretation of what the CAS panel was stating.


From my perspective, I see NOTHING VAGUE in your statements. Since they are your statements, I'm quite sure that you know that your own statements are clear to you.

You even went on to compare statements made in other separate cases in the years 2002 vs 2010 and with your new evidence, you still believe you are right.

Cool!








CHALLENGE IS ON!!!!



.

Look at you going crazy I LOVE IT!!!!!

Now tell everyone why you accepted the challenge and then when I reminded you that the court specifically said you are wrong, you immediately declined.

Can you do that for me????

Why are you trying to pretend that you didn't just back down. I JUST CHALLENGED YOU ABOUT THE DAMN COURT CASE...AND YOU BACKED THE FVVCK DOWN LIKE A BROKE DlCK DOG AS SOON AS I MENTIONED THAT THE COURT SPECIFICALLY SAID YOU WERE WRONG. DIDN'T YOU JUST DECLINE??????? DIDN'T YOU????

I PROVED THAT YOU DON'T EVEN BELIEVE WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN SAYING. YOU'VE BEEN ARGUING ABOUT THIS COURT CASE FOR WEEKS AND THEN ONCE I GET YOU TO ACCEPT AND I SAID LET'S GET THE JUDGES...BUT YOU GOTTA BE A ****** MUFFUCCA TO HAVE ACCEPTED THIS.....

YOU RAN FOR THE HILLS!!!! THE PROOF IS ALL IN THIS THREAD.


What do you see? ME ACCEPTING AND SAYING, OK LET'S GET THE JUDGES.

YOU SAYING.....OHHHH...MY BAD. I DON'T WANT THAT SMOKE ANYMORE.


So here's what i'm going to do for you, little guy.


You've proven to be a dishonest, deflecting bastard over and over and over again. You want another debate? Ok. Here's what you do.


1. Admit that you lost the first debate here, 4-0:

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

2. Make a public apology to the 4 judges that you claimed cheated in this debate. That would be Billeau2, Willy Wanker, Zaroku, and Tony Montana.

3. Give me the points that you WELCHED OUT ON from losing this debate. 100,000,000,000 points


After that, we discuss a new debate. Prove you are a man who will accept when he is wrong, and who will abide by the stipulations of the bet. I'm tired of you welching on challenges, accusing people of cheating, and welching on your debt!!! I'll be waiting

[img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[ADP02]

Look at you going crazy I LOVE IT!!!!!

Now tell everyone why you accepted the challenge and then when I reminded you that the court specifically said you are wrong, you immediately declined.

Can you do that for me????

Why are you trying to pretend that you didn't just back down. I JUST CHALLENGED YOU ABOUT THE DAMN COURT CASE...AND YOU BACKED THE FVVCK DOWN LIKE A BROKE DlCK DOG AS SOON AS I MENTIONED THAT THE COURT SPECIFICALLY SAID YOU WERE WRONG. DIDN'T YOU JUST DECLINE??????? DIDN'T YOU????

I PROVED THAT YOU DON'T EVEN BELIEVE WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN SAYING. YOU'VE BEEN ARGUING ABOUT THIS COURT CASE FOR WEEKS AND THEN ONCE I GET YOU TO ACCEPT AND I SAID LET'S GET THE JUDGES...BUT YOU GOTTA BE A ****** MUFFUCCA TO HAVE ACCEPTED THIS.....

YOU RAN FOR THE HILLS!!!! THE PROOF IS ALL IN THIS THREAD.


What do you see? ME ACCEPTING AND SAYING, OK LET'S GET THE JUDGES.

YOU SAYING.....OHHHH...MY BAD. I DON'T WANT THAT SMOKE ANYMORE.


So here's what i'm going to do for you, little guy.


You've proven to be a dishonest, deflecting bastard over and over and over again. You want another debate? Ok. Here's what you do.


1. Admit that you lost the first debate here, 4-0:

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

2. Make a public apology to the 4 judges that you claimed cheated in this debate. That would be Billeau2, Willy Wanker, Zaroku, and Tony Montana.

3. Give me the points that you WELCHED OUT ON from losing this debate. 100,000,000,000 points


After that, we discuss a new debate. Prove you are a man who will accept when he is wrong, and who will abide by the stipulations of the bet. I'm tired of you welching on challenges, accusing people of cheating, and welching on your debt!!! I'll be waiting

Yes, this is going to be fun for sure. This will NOT stop until YOU respond to this CHALLENGE, honestly!

ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE OR DUCK which PROVES that YOU, Travestyny WERE WRONG!

While I had a kick in proving to YOU that you were WRONG, it is just as important that this shows your true colors. That is, the more you do not admit the truth, the more you will be proving my point!

You are not honest and the win for YOU is more important that the TRUTH!!!!

We can "mention" this to all. The more that read this the more people will realize the truth. This one is just 11 pages (so far). Spoon got this right away. You think you can fool everyone all of the time? You wish! This will prove what I have been saying all along!


In fact, all they need to read is the first page where I created this thread and therefore the CHALLENGE then see you trying to squirm for about 10 pages.



As for your silly SPIN, AGAIN, the truth is in these posts!!!



- I clearly challenged you! I started this thread and stayed consistent!

- YOU KNOW YOU CANNOT WIN! So you DEFLECTED and tried to SPIN this to something else.



- POST # 70 & 72, I respond to you stating that you are trying to SPIN (DEFLECT) to something else. Then steer you back on why I am CHALLENGING YOU!!!!


I asked YOU TO BE HONEST!!!!


- You pretend to IGNORE my CHALLENGE but in the background, it is obvious that you were trying to see if you can beat me at MY CHALLENGE


You verified a case from 2002 vs 2010 and you thought you had me! WRONG!

- You thought you had something but I explained that away and you lost your confidence, even more.

- So you kept on SPINNING and I kept on LAUGHING

- You pretended and ignored my post of LAUGHING at YOU and YOUR SPIN. YOU then LIED and said that I accepted your challenge. You are a very dishonest person!!!







BUT as I said, the TRUTH is in these posts.

AGAIN, I clearly challenged you! I started this thread and stayed consistent!

and how can I accept your challenge when I was laughing at your "SPIN" and DEFLECTIONs?


and did you not see me steering you back to reality of the TRUE CHALLENGE?




As I have been saying for several posts now. Accept the CHALLENGE or Admit the TRUTH that

YOU KNOW THAT YOU CANNOT WIN!!!

That is why you have been DEFLECTING and SPINNING and AVOIDING!!!!


All you had to do is admit that YOU WERE WRONG TRAVESTNY!!!!


but you cannot. It is not in your genetic code. Well, you are the one they call,

THE DEFLECTOR!!!


THE CHALLENGE IS ON. Either ACCEPT or DUCK!!!!!


There is NO WAY OUT!!!




AFTER I told you to be honest and stop the spinning you try to SPIN this again stating that I accept the SPIN!!!!

It is all here and PROOF of the dishonest person that you are. Very telling! I realized this way back but this thread is going to ruin you, sorry!


ALL the SPINNING from you is to DEFLECT away from the CHALLENGE!!!!


I CHALLENGED YOU, not the other way around! What a joker!!!!




So where were we? Oh yeah,
You misinterpreted what the CAS panel said. You actually thought that anyone and everyone who called the EPO test a threshold test was WRONG!!!!

I have included a post where you state this.

You told me this over and over again and when I asked you, you refused to admit that YOU WERE WRONG. In fact, you called me moron, idiot and so on but now we BOTH know the TRUTH!!!

YOU WERE WRONG and it is time to either admit or accept the challenge.... It appears that you cannot admit and prefer to DUCK …. but let us all know!!!!



CHALLENGE IS ON

Let me know if you be

accepting or DUCKING!!!



.

[Spoon23]

Okay I won't be the Judge, But I will lock this premise.

Once you figure out the premise which Travesty seems to be having a hard time undersanding. Then I'll seal this debate.


For crying out loud Travesty, stop being fickle like the biatch that you are and agree to the premise that has been agreed upon a long time ago. We are only in the preliminary and you guys have been going no where.

Once I receive the premise from you guys. It's locked and loaded. No twisting shyit. You guys have to live and die by the premise.

Pls define also the terms of losing. What's at stake.

[ADP02]

Okay I won't be the Judge, But I will lock this premise.

Once you figure out the premise which Travesty seems to be having a hard time undersanding. Then I'll seal this debate.


For crying out loud Travesty, stop being fickle like the biatch that you are and agree to the premise that has been agreed upon a long time ago. We are only in the preliminary and you guys have been going no where.

Once I receive the premise from you guys. It's locked and loaded. No twisting shyit. You guys have to live and die by the premise.

Pls define also the terms of losing. What's at stake.

Spoon,

My CHALLENGE for Travesytny has been from the start his misinterpretation of what the CAS panel was discussing.


This is clear as day what I asked him and what Travestyny meant with his response.

Travestyny and I have been going at this for 2 months!

The problem is that Travestyny has lost his previous confidence (ie. He now knows that he is WRONG) and has been trying everything and anything to DUCK the CHALLENGE without making it look like he is ducking the challenge.



Here is what Travestyny misinterpreted. It is CLEAR and NOT VAGUE :

I even made references to EXPERTs and "others" that were not involved in the case!

ADP02


Question: You said it is not a threshold type test.
a) Why did BOTH sides call it a threshold test in that case that you referenced?
b) In my post, even WADA expert Segura calls it a threshold test. Was the expert wrong?
c) Others called it that too! Are they all wrong?

Travestyny

Question A, B, and C:
THE COURT FOR ARBITRATION OF SPORT HAS CORRECTED ANYONE THAT HAS EVER CALLED THIS A THRESHOLD TEST A NUMBER OF TIMES....BECAUSE IT IS NOT A THRESHOLD TEST!!!!!




THE ONLY THING THAT WAS EVER REFERRED TO AS A THRESHOLD WAS THE OLD WAY OF TESTING: THE BAP. AND THE COURT EVEN SAID THAT IS NOT A THRESHOLD TEST.



HERE IT IS AGAIN!!!!

Court of Arbitration for Sport!

Quote:
The criterion for EPO is not a measurement over the threshold that must occur

The fact is that the BAP and the other interpretative criteria are used to declare not a threshold of human body production but rather an image from the electropherogram as indicating the presence of non-human EPO.

there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance

It even specifically mentions that the BAP is not a threshold test. WADA DEFERS TO THE COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT!!!!!

[travestyny]

Yes, this is going to be fun for sure. This will NOT stop until YOU respond to this CHALLENGE, honestly!

ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE OR DUCK which PROVES that YOU, Travestyny WERE WRONG!

While I had a kick in proving to YOU that you were WRONG, it is just as important that this shows your true colors. That is, the more you do not admit the truth, the more you will be proving my point!

You are not honest and the win for YOU is more important that the TRUTH!!!!

We can "mention" this to all. The more that read this the more people will realize the truth. This one is just 11 pages (so far). Spoon got this right away. You think you can fool everyone all of the time? You wish! This will prove what I have been saying all along!


In fact, all they need to read is the first page where I created this thread and therefore the CHALLENGE then see you trying to squirm for about 10 pages.



As for your silly SPIN, AGAIN, the truth is in these posts!!!



- I clearly challenged you! I started this thread and stayed consistent!

- YOU KNOW YOU CANNOT WIN! So you DEFLECTED and tried to SPIN this to something else.



- POST # 70 & 72, I respond to you stating that you are trying to SPIN (DEFLECT) to something else. Then steer you back on why I am CHALLENGING YOU!!!!


I asked YOU TO BE HONEST!!!!


- You pretend to IGNORE my CHALLENGE but in the background, it is obvious that you were trying to see if you can beat me at MY CHALLENGE


You verified a case from 2002 vs 2010 and you thought you had me! WRONG!

- You thought you had something but I explained that away and you lost your confidence, even more.

- So you kept on SPINNING and I kept on LAUGHING

- You pretended and ignored my post of LAUGHING at YOU and YOUR SPIN. YOU then LIED and said that I accepted your challenge. You are a very dishonest person!!!







BUT as I said, the TRUTH is in these posts.

AGAIN, I clearly challenged you! I started this thread and stayed consistent!

and how can I accept your challenge when I was laughing at your "SPIN" and DEFLECTIONs?


and did you not see me steering you back to reality of the TRUE CHALLENGE?




As I have been saying for several posts now. Accept the CHALLENGE or Admit the TRUTH that

YOU KNOW THAT YOU CANNOT WIN!!!

That is why you have been DEFLECTING and SPINNING and AVOIDING!!!!


All you had to do is admit that YOU WERE WRONG TRAVESTNY!!!!


but you cannot. It is not in your genetic code. Well, you are the one they call,

THE DEFLECTOR!!!


THE CHALLENGE IS ON. Either ACCEPT or DUCK!!!!!


There is NO WAY OUT!!!




AFTER I told you to be honest and stop the spinning you try to SPIN this again stating that I accept the SPIN!!!!

It is all here and PROOF of the dishonest person that you are. Very telling! I realized this way back but this thread is going to ruin you, sorry!


ALL the SPINNING from you is to DEFLECT away from the CHALLENGE!!!!


I CHALLENGED YOU, not the other way around! What a joker!!!!




So where were we? Oh yeah,
You misinterpreted what the CAS panel said. You actually thought that anyone and everyone who called the EPO test a threshold test was WRONG!!!!

I have included a post where you state this.

You told me this over and over again and when I asked you, you refused to admit that YOU WERE WRONG. In fact, you called me moron, idiot and so on but now we BOTH know the TRUTH!!!

YOU WERE WRONG and it is time to either admit or accept the challenge.... It appears that you cannot admit and prefer to DUCK …. but let us all know!!!!



CHALLENGE IS ON

Let me know if you be

accepting or DUCKING!!!



.

That's a whole lot of writing. Do you think I've read any of your essays after you accepted and then declined??? I haven't. I told you what to do. You want to play games and welch on challenges???? You want to invite me here on something vague, avoiding the main issue that we were discussing. Ok...no problem.

You've proven to be a dishonest, deflecting bastard over and over and over again, posting over and over about something that you OBVIOUSLY don't believe or you wouldn't have tucked tail and declined. You want another debate? Ok. Here's what you do.


1. Admit that you lost the first debate here, 4-0.

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

2. Make a public apology to the 4 judges that you claimed cheated in this debate. That would be Billeau2, Willy Wanker, Zaroku, and Tony Montana.

3. Give me the points that you welched out on from losing this debate. 100,000,000,000 points

matter of fact, let's add another one.

4. Apologize to me for saying that I cheated in the debate and manipulated the judges!

or how about this one:

5. Apologize for LYING and saying that the original topic was not about threshold substances because you realized that you were wrong about threshold substances, which I have already proven.

or this one....

6. Apologize for lying and saying that this wasn't about Mayweather being tested, which was obvious.


After that, we discuss a new debate. Prove you are a man who will accept when he is wrong, and who will abide by the stipulations of the bet. I'm tired of you welching on challenges, accusing people of cheating, and welching on your debt!!! I'll be waiting

[travestyny]

Spoon,

My CHALLENGE for Travesytny has been from the start his misinterpretation of what the CAS panel was discussing.


This is clear as day what I asked him and what Travestyny meant with his response.

Travestyny and I have been going at this for 2 months!

The problem is that Travestyny has lost his previous confidence (ie. He now knows that he is WRONG) and has been trying everything and anything to DUCK the CHALLENGE without making it look like he is ducking the challenge.



Here is what Travestyny misinterpreted. It is CLEAR and NOT VAGUE :

I even made references to EXPERTs and "others" that were not involved in the case!

1. The BAP is not a threshold type test. It is ONLY a test.

2. I challenged you about the court case over and over again. I can prove that! The last time I did, you accepted, I mentioned that you have to be a ****** muffucca to agree to a challenge where the court explicitly said it is not a threshold, AND THEN YOU BACKED OUT.

3. Not only was this CERTAINLY not a threshold in the case we were discussing because there WASN'T A NUMERICAL LIMIT, but the court also went as far as to correct the athlete, and thus corrected EVERYONE that the BAP is IN REALITY (the court's words not mine), NOT A THRESHOLD. This is also backed up in 2010 when they say the same fvvcking thing. THE CRITERIA ARE NOT THRESHOLDS. YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT A THRESHOLD IS, YOU MORON, OR WHY THEY ARE SAYING THAT THIS DOES NOT REPRESENT ONE. IT'S YOU THAT WASN'T CONFIDENT ABOUT THIS CASE, WHICH IS WHY YOU IMMEDIATELY DECLINED.

You're busy trying to say that then mentioning it not being a threshold substance is saying something different.....YET YOU ARE ON RECORD SAYING EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT THEY SAID ABOUT THIS.

The threshold test result indicates that there is synthetic EPO if it exceeds the threshold. If less, the indication is that there is only human EPO.

there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance

You want to discuss a new challenge? Ok. I gave you your orders. Hop to it!

[travestyny]

Okay I won't be the Judge, But I will lock this premise.

Once you figure out the premise which Travesty seems to be having a hard time undersanding. Then I'll seal this debate.


For crying out loud Travesty, stop being fickle like the biatch that you are and agree to the premise that has been agreed upon a long time ago. We are only in the preliminary and you guys have been going no where.

Once I receive the premise from you guys. It's locked and loaded. No twisting shyit. You guys have to live and die by the premise.

Pls define also the terms of losing. What's at stake.

Shut up, bltch. Who the fvcck are you? I already told you. Go ask your boy why he accepted and then one post later declined.


Did you ask him? Get to it. Chop chop!!!!

[ADP02]

That's a whole lot of writing. Do you think I've read any of your essays after you accepted and then declined??? I haven't. I told you what to do. You want to play games and welch on challenges???? You want to invite me here on something vague, avoiding the main issue that we were discussing. Ok...no problem.

You've proven to be a dishonest, deflecting bastard over and over and over again, posting over and over about something that you OBVIOUSLY don't believe or you wouldn't have tucked tail and declined. You want another debate? Ok. Here's what you do.


1. Admit that you lost the first debate here, 4-0.

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

2. Make a public apology to the 4 judges that you claimed cheated in this debate. That would be Billeau2, Willy Wanker, Zaroku, and Tony Montana.

3. Give me the points that you welched out on from losing this debate. 100,000,000,000 points

matter of fact, let's add another one.

4. Apologize to me for saying that I cheated in the debate and manipulated the judges!

or how about this one:

5. Apologize for LYING and saying that the original topic was not about threshold substances because you realized that you were wrong about threshold substances, which I have already proven.

or this one....

6. Apologize for lying and saying that this wasn't about Mayweather being tested, which was obvious.


After that, we discuss a new debate. Prove you are a man who will accept when he is wrong, and who will abide by the stipulations of the bet. I'm tired of you welching on challenges, accusing people of cheating, and welching on your debt!!! I'll be waiting

DEFLECTOR at work!!!!


Are you serious!!!

1) Who started this thread? ADP02

2) So then I was the challenging YOU? ADP02

3) Did you accept my challenge? NO, Travestyny has been DUCKing!


4) My challenge is very important and actually is an extension of last year. Why? You provided this information to a judge and only now you admit was irrelevant!!!


5) So it is YOU that needs to apologize!!!

Dishonest people do not get a reward! Got it?


6) Not only that, you cannot even get yourself to defend that statement that you provided to the judge!!! Oooops!!!!!

Dishonest people do not get a reward! Got it?

7) By you DUCKing, it proves that you have no confidence and know that YOU ARE WRONG, CHUMP!!!



.

[travestyny]

DEFLECTOR at work!!!!


Are you serious!!!

1) Who started this thread? ADP02

2) So then I was the challenging YOU? ADP02

3) Did you accept my challenge? NO, Travestyny has been DUCKing!


4) My challenge is very important and actually is an extension of last year. Why? You provided this information to a judge and only now you admit was irrelevant!!!


5) So it is YOU that needs to apologize!!!

Dishonest people do not get a reward! Got it?


6) Not only that, you cannot even get yourself to defend that statement that you provided to the judge!!! Oooops!!!!!

Dishonest people do not get a reward! Got it?

7) By you DUCKing, it proves that you have no confidence and know that YOU ARE WRONG, CHUMP!!!



.

Dude, you have DECLINED a rematch when you asked me to come in here on your vague bullshlt. Ask yourself why you declined but asked me to come here for some vague shlt. You said you had a problem with judges who were not knowledgeable enough. Then suddenly no problem with judges? Hmmmmm.

Then you accepted a challenge here, and one post later declined. Do you think I'm going to keep playing these games with you. I told you what to do.


START HERE!

You've proven to be a dishonest, deflecting bastard over and over and over again. You want another debate? Ok. Here's what you do.


1. Admit that you lost the first debate here, 4-0.

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

2. Make a public apology to the 4 judges that you claimed cheated in this debate. That would be Billeau2, Willy Wanker, Zaroku, and Tony Montana.

3. Give me the points that you owe me from losing this debate. 100,000,000,000 points


After that, we discuss a new debate. Prove you are a man who will accept when he is wrong, and who will abide by the stipulations of the bet. I'm tired of you welching on challenges, accusing people of cheating, and welching on your debt!!! I'll be waiting


PAY YOUR FVVCKING DEBT AND PROVE THAT YOU WILL DO SO WITH ANY FUTURE DEBATE. ADMIT THAT YOU LOST. DON'T EVEN TALK ABOUT ANYONE BEIGN DISHONEST WHEN YOU WON'T EVEN PAY WHAT YOU OWE!!!!


AND BY THE WAY, STOP LYING. I ACCEPTED A CHALLENGE HERE AND SAID LET'S MOVE TO GET THE JUDGES. RIGHT AFTER I SAID THAT, YOU ABOUT FACED AND DECLINED!!!!!

[ADP02]

1. The BAP is not a threshold type test. It is ONLY a test.

2. I challenged you about the court case over and over again. I can prove that! The last time I did, you accepted, I mentioned that you have to be a ****** muffucca to agree to a challenge where the court explicitly said it is not a threshold, AND THEN YOU BACKED OUT.

3. Not only was this CERTAINLY not a threshold in the case we were discussing because there WASN'T A NUMERICAL LIMIT, but the court also went as far as to correct the athlete, and thus corrected EVERYONE that the BAP is IN REALITY (the court's words not mine), NOT A THRESHOLD. This is also backed up in 2010 when they say the same fvvcking thing. THE CRITERIA ARE NOT THRESHOLDS. YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT A THRESHOLD IS, YOU MORON, OR WHY THEY ARE SAYING THAT THIS DOES NOT REPRESENT ONE. IT'S YOU THAT WASN'T CONFIDENT ABOUT THIS CASE, WHICH IS WHY YOU IMMEDIATELY DECLINED.

You're busy trying to say that then mentioning it not being a threshold substance is saying something different.....YET YOU ARE ON RECORD SAYING EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT THEY SAID ABOUT THIS.





You want to discuss a new challenge? Ok. I gave you your orders. Hop to it!

QUESTION:
1) How can I be accepting your challenge when I was challenging YOU and staying consistent with my request?


2) How can I be accepting a challenge when I laughed off your SPIN in the posts prior to that? and then steered you back to what the main topic is?


The only thing that is for sure is what you said below.
and that I started this thread to CHALLENGE YOU!!!!


YOU ARE NO LONGER CONFIDENT.


YOU KNOW THAT YOU WILL LOSE!!!

ADP02


Question: You said it is not a threshold type test.
a) Why did BOTH sides call it a threshold test in that case that you referenced?
b) In my post, even WADA expert Segura calls it a threshold test. Was the expert wrong?
c) Others called it that too! Are they all wrong?

Travestyny

Question A, B, and C:
THE COURT FOR ARBITRATION OF SPORT HAS CORRECTED ANYONE THAT HAS EVER CALLED THIS A THRESHOLD TEST A NUMBER OF TIMES....BECAUSE IT IS NOT A THRESHOLD TEST!!!!!




THE ONLY THING THAT WAS EVER REFERRED TO AS A THRESHOLD WAS THE OLD WAY OF TESTING: THE BAP. AND THE COURT EVEN SAID THAT IS NOT A THRESHOLD TEST.



HERE IT IS AGAIN!!!!

Court of Arbitration for Sport!

Quote:
The criterion for EPO is not a measurement over the threshold that must occur

The fact is that the BAP and the other interpretative criteria are used to declare not a threshold of human body production but rather an image from the electropherogram as indicating the presence of non-human EPO.

there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance

It even specifically mentions that the BAP is not a threshold test. WADA DEFERS TO THE COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT!!!!!

DO YOU NO LONGER BELIEVE WHAT YOU SAID, Travestyny????


Why are you so scared?


CHALLENGE IS ON!!!!!





.