Originally posted by travestyny
View Post
1) It is because the discussion was about what is the BAP test.
Originally Posted by travestyny
I've told you this a billion times in this very thread.
The Panel stated clearly that the BAP is not a threshold test.
I've told you this a billion times in this very thread.
The Panel stated clearly that the BAP is not a threshold test.
3) You stated that even a WADA EPO expert had this wrong.
Originally Posted by travestyny
I've answered this a million times. I told you that the WADA experts referred to the BAP as a threshold, but the CAS stated that it was in reality not a threshold. I can't say that any more clearly.
I've answered this a million times. I told you that the WADA experts referred to the BAP as a threshold, but the CAS stated that it was in reality not a threshold. I can't say that any more clearly.
Either that or admit that you were wrong about the BAP test for EPO testing.
5) YOU brought up this case! You brought up those statements. You even went as far as to say that not only EPO but all threshold substances cannot have threshold tests.
6) CAS panels bring up not just 1 case, they reference all cases that are relevant. Yes, even if it is not about the International Federations rules but just to explain the statements or references made.
You want to restrict knowledge. WTF!!!! The CAS overrules Travestyny!!!!
Take the challenge PIUSSY!!!!!!
.
.
Comment