Can non-threshold susbtances have threshold type tests

[ADP02]

Travestyny,

I accept!!!!


BUT ……

Lol Hahaha GIF from Lol GIFs

i saw no but in my statement. But i see adp running from me because he's scared!!! Lmaooooo.

I ACCEPTED, BlTCH.


YOU CAN'T FIND CAN IN MY STATEMENT,

BUT

I FOUND IT IN THE COURT'S STATEMENT, SO THIS MUST HAVE BEEN WHAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT, RIGHT?

I found the BUT DUCKY

and more importantly,
that is YOU pretending to accept my challenge BUT that BUT of yours means that you are not ready to accept the challenge based on the topic/scope that I stated.



.

[travestyny]

I found the BUT DUCKY

and more importantly,
that is YOU pretending to accept my challenge BUT that BUT of yours means that you are not ready to accept the challenge based on the topic/scope that I stated.



.

BUT YOU DIDN'T FIND YOUR BALLS!

You are lame as fvvck. Seriously. Do you know how pathetic you are?


Find it here, bltch:

CHALLENGE ACCEPTED. USE YOUR 'CAN.' AGREE TO THE WAGER. ALL POINTS. PERMANENT BAN IF YOU CAN'T PROVE THAT YOU SHOULD HAVE WON THE FORMER DEBATE. LET'S GO!

[travestyny]

YOU SAID IT'S ABOUT WHO IS INTERPRETING THE COURT CASE IN THE RIGHT WAY, RIGHT? WELL LET'S SETTLE IT. DO YOU ACCEPT OR DECLINE?

The argument is not what the CAS panel said but your interpretation!!!!

ARE YOU READY TO SEE WHO IS INTERPRETING THE COURT CASE IN THE RIGHT WAY? I ACCEPT!!!!!!

LET'S SEE WHO IS INTERPRETING THIS CASE PROPERLY, SHALL WE????

The Court: THE BAP AND OTHER CRITERIA DON'T REPRESENT A THRESHOLD. THERE IS NO THRESHOLD ABOVE WHICH IT CAN BE SAID THERE IS rEPO.

"The fact is that the BAP and the other interpretative criteria are used to declare not a threshold of human body production but rather an image from the electropherogram as indicating the presence of non-human EPO. Therefore, in the case of rEPO, there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance.

ADP: THE BAP AND THE OTHER CRITERIA ALL REPRESENT A THRESHOLD. THERE IS A THRESHOLD ABOVE WHICH IT CAN BE SAID THERE IS rEPO.

The threshold test result indicates that there is synthetic EPO if it exceeds the threshold. If less, the indication is that there is only human EPO.

all 4 criteria were threshold type tests!!!!

IS THERE SOMETHING THAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND, ADP? YOU TELL ME.

DON'T TURN AROUND NOW AND TELL ME THAT IT'S NOT ABOUT MY INTERPRETATION

ACCEPT OR DECLINE? DON'T GO TELLING ME THAT IT'S NOW NOT ABOUT THE INTERPRETATION. YOU LITERALLY JUST SAID THAT. NO ROOM FOR YOU TO BACK DOWN, BlTCH. ACCEPT AND LET'S GET IT OVER WITH!

[ADP02]

YAWN!


I'm just waiting for you to ACCEPT my challenge based on the topic/scope that I stated.

Originally Posted by ADP02
I have wada experts stating that there are threshold type tests.

how are those wada experts wrong?????

Originally Posted by travestyny
i did answer your question. They were corrected clearly by the court.

[travestyny]

YAWN!


I'm just waiting for you to ACCEPT my challenge based on the topic/scope that I stated.

THE COURT CORRECTED EVERYONE, AS I STATED. AND WHO THE FVVCK DO YOU THINK HELPED THE COURT TO REACH THEIR DECISION YOU MORON!

STILL WAITINGGGGGGG!!!!!

COME ON, ADP. YOU KEEP SAYING THE WADA EXPERTS CALLED IT A THRESHOLD. LET'S SEE WHAT THE SUPREME COURT OF SPORTS SAID IN REALITY IT IS AFTER BEING GUIDED BY A WADA EXPERT

why are you still ducking? Do you accept or not. Time for you to stop being a pvssy all your life!

ACCEPT OR DECLINE? YOU LITERALLY JUST SAID IT'S ABOUT OUR INTERPRETATION OF THOSE STATEMENTS. THERE IS NO ROOM FOR YOU TO BACK DOWN. LET'S GOOOOOO! ACCEPT OR DECLINE?????

[travestyny]

COME ONNNNN, ADP. WHERE YOU AT? LET'S FIND OUT THE FACT AND THE REALITY ABOUT THIS TESTING CRITERIA

The reality is that the criterion for EPO is not a measurement over the threshold that must occur to take account of the human body's production. The fact is that the BAP and the other interpretative criteria are used to declare not a threshold of human body production but rather an image from the electropherogram as indicating the presence of non-human EPO. Therefore, in the case of rEPO, there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance

DO YOU ACCEPT OR DECLINE? STILL WAITINGGGGG! DON'T DUCK YOUR OWN CHALLENGE!!!!
DO IT FOR YOUR MAKE BELIEVE AUDIENCE HERE!

[ADP02]

DUCKY who pretends to be confident,

You said that threshold type tests were not in place for EPO testing and the CAS panel statements proved that. That they corrected any EXPERT that stated so.

You used those statements to make a general statement that there was never a threshold type test in place for EPO testing.


So are you ready for the actual challenge?


I'm just waiting for you to ACCEPT my challenge based on the topic/scope that I stated.


QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!!!!

[travestyny]

DUCKY who pretends to be confident,

You said that threshold type tests were not in place for EPO testing and the CAS panel statements proved that. That they corrected any EXPERT that stated so.

You used those statements to make a general statement that there was never a threshold type test in place for EPO testing.


So are you ready for the actual challenge?


I'm just waiting for you to ACCEPT my challenge based on the topic/scope that I stated.


QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!!!!

I've accepted your challenge 20 million times now, and you're still crying. You're welcome to argue that there is a threshold above which it can be said that there is rEPO. That's what your quotation says, and I'm waiting for you to accept that challenge, son.


If you back down, I'll just laugh at you for the rest of our life. Step up and stop being a bltch.


Oh, and feel free to keep making your your own dialoge about my posts. The judges will have no problem seeing right through you

STEP UP, COWARD!

ADP IS DEPERATE AND STILL TRYING TO MAKE UP HIS OWN QUOTATIONS BECAUSE HE KNOWS HE GOT HANDLED 4-0, AND HE'S GOING TO GET HANDLED AGAIN IF HE EVER FINDS HIS BALLS!!!!

[travestyny]

YOU'RE ALL OVER THE PLACE.. because you're a straight pvssy.


MAKE UP YOUR DAMN MIND ABOUT WHAT QUOTATION OF MINE YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH ALREADY, POST IT TO THE JUDGES, AND LET'S GET IT ON.


STOP YOUR FVVCKING SQUIRMING. YOU'RE LIKE A DESPERATE LITTLE BlTCH TRYING TO SQUIRM AWAY.

ACCEPT THE FVVCKING CHALLENGE, POST WHAT YOU WANT TO THE JUDGES, AND LET'S GET IT ON. IF NOT, JUST FALL BACK AND ADMIT THAT YOU DUCKED ME LIKE YOU'VE BEEN DOING FOR THE PAST FEW MONTHS YOU LITTLE BlTCH.

THE TIME FOR YOUR VAGINA LEAKING IS OVER. IT'S TIME FOR YOU TO STEP UP.

ACCEPT OR DECLINE? WHAT'S IT GOING TO BE?

[ADP02]

DUCKY who pretends to be confident,

You said that threshold type tests were not in place for EPO testing and the CAS panel statements proved that. That they corrected any EXPERT that stated so.

You used those statements to make a general statement that there was never a threshold type test in place for EPO testing.


So are you ready for the actual challenge?


I'm just waiting for you to ACCEPT my challenge based on the topic/scope that I stated.


QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!!!!

I've accepted your challenge 20 million times now, and you're still crying. You're welcome to argue that there is a threshold above which it can be said that there is rEPO. That's what your quotation says, and I'm waiting for you to accept that challenge, son.


If you back down, I'll just laugh at you for the rest of our life. Step up and stop being a bltch.


Oh, and feel free to keep making your your own dialoge about my posts. The judges will have no problem seeing right through you

STEP UP, COWARD!

See, you cannot get the courage to actually accept my challenge. Your comeback always has more to say than what the challenge is about.


Each post of yours you come back with something different. Either about the single case or about other statements.

Well, it is not about other statements nor is it just about a single case.

It is about your interpretations of the CAS panel's statements. You used those statements to state that threshold type tests were not in place for EPO testing because they couldn't be. Not before that case and not after that case since you used that case as evidence for our previous debate! You believe, that the CAS panel corrected everyone who stated so.




So DUCKY, are you ready to accept my challenge as per my topic/scope?



QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!!!!


.