Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Am I the only person who thinks David Tua would have beaten Tyson?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Am I the only person who thinks David Tua would have beaten Tyson?

    Tyson has the edge in speed, I think their power is equal, but Tua has more heart and his cardio was better in the latter rounds.

    I always felt Tua would out**** Tyson.

  • #2
    Yes you are

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Science View Post
      Tyson has the edge in speed, I think their power is equal, but Tua has more heart and his cardio was better in the latter rounds.

      I always felt Tua would out**** Tyson.
      - -Scientists know, not touchie feelie like U.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Science View Post
        Tyson has the edge in speed, I think their power is equal, but Tua has more heart and his cardio was better in the latter rounds.

        I always felt Tua would out**** Tyson.
        There was a time when a lot of people with very little understanding of the intricacies of the sport thought that to be a possibility.

        Tua had one punch, no footwork, no real method to his approach...He would try to wade in and catch people with his left hook.

        Tyson had power in both hands, speed in his feet, used a methodical approach to getting at his man, pioneered by Dempsey. Golota was held up as being able to also catch Tyson. Again, Golota had good punch selection, speed, and was not slow with his feet, so he had a lot more than Tua. But Mike came at him with all his gifts... the rest was history.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Science View Post
          Tyson has the edge in speed, I think their power is equal, but Tua has more heart and his cardio was better in the latter rounds.

          I always felt Tua would out**** Tyson.
          - -What does an alchemist know about the science of boxing?

          You give no conditions. The best of each beats the worst of each...Duh!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by billeau2 View Post
            There was a time when a lot of people with very little understanding of the intricacies of the sport thought that to be a possibility.

            Tua had one punch, no footwork, no real method to his approach...He would try to wade in and catch people with his left hook.

            Tyson had power in both hands, speed in his feet, used a methodical approach to getting at his man, pioneered by Dempsey. Golota was held up as being able to also catch Tyson. Again, Golota had good punch selection, speed, and was not slow with his feet, so he had a lot more than Tua. But Mike came at him with all his gifts... the rest was history.
            Tyson gets discouraged after 4 rounds. Tua possibly stops him late

            Comment


            • #7
              Tua had the grip for a hella lefhook. His right hand grip was so so.

              Comment


              • #8
                Lethal left+Great chin: See Tyson vs Ruddock for most probable similar results

                Comment


                • #9
                  Ffs are u ****ing serious...tyson starts to wilt after 4rounds...what a GIANT BELLEND you are

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    It would of been a great fight.

                    Mike Tyson had better movement, greater hand speed, creativity, defense, and better combinations.

                    But David Tua, had great durability, great stamina, and immense punching power 'His defense was alright, but nothing highly sophisticated'.

                    Mike Tyson would win via 12th round unanimous decision 'Tua would of probably be ruined after the fight'

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP