You can get HIV through hetrosexual sex for sure. But the thing that killed Tommy was his denial he had it at the end of his life. Look at his fight night champion interview, he looks like he's almost there at the end.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How did Tommy Morrison contract HIV?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by sentax View PostWhere are you pulling your numbers from?
There is a .04% rate of HIV transmission from female to male heterosexual sex acts.
If you are avoiding **** sex and intravenous drug use your chances of getting HIV are close to zero.
https://www.hivlawandpolicy.org/reso...-meta-analysis
I guess the take away is always have
protected sex.Last edited by TonyGe; 12-23-2019, 10:27 PM.
Comment
-
If a disease is sexually transmitted, then it doesn't matter if it's through gay or straight sex. The risk is the same. There was just more sex going on at the time in the gay community through hookups at gay bars and bathhouses, which is why the CDC in San Francisco eventually closed them down during the height of the outbreak. A book was written about the AIDS epidemic by Randy Shilts called And The Band Played On, which was later made into an HBO movie.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anthony32 View PostIf a disease is sexwoually transmitted, then it doesn't matter if it's through gay or straight sex. The risk is the same. There was just more sex going on at the time in the gay community through hookups at gay bars and bathhouses, which is why the CDC in San Francisco eventually closed them down during the height of the outbreak. A book was written about the AIDS epidemic by Randy Shilts called And The Band Played On, which was later made into an HBO movie.
wj/
my ex boss, a flaming phag.. said i would be in demand.. i was just released. and san franciso the tenderloin was home to me...
phags galore.. i used to pass them as they shared needles. last year when I was in Vallejo.. waiting on Truboxfan to show up, so we could eat or fight.. either way.. i do not give a phuck...
anyway.... the city back in my time was filled with punks, and supre supreme phaggatrons.. they exchanged fluids.. shot dope, shared needles and boys....
i am glad I did not contract anything.. lucky for me.. i choose better cum sluts.. sluts with a bit more on the ball than sluts that had a pizinmp.
freaky azz chit was going down.. but who cares, they bought my cousins coke, meth and other party favors....Last edited by Zaroku; 12-24-2019, 01:28 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TonyGe View PostI can't find the original link. The website I got my information from was indicating the percentages of people that have AIDS and how it was transmitted not the risk to the general population. I did another search and found this information. This chart refers to men with AIDS. I can't recall if the one I quoted was for Men only or for Men and Women.
I guess the take away is always have
protected sex.
Your pie circle is case in point.
The categories are grade school stuff. They cannot pin down who is heterosexual other than the presumed male to female category.
Guaranteed if in a mutual male/female monogamous relationship with both parties noncarriers from the start, ain't gonna get HIV.
And you could say the same for ****sexuals, but the catch is not all ****sexuals are the same. Males are proven to be the highest infected, and then you get into race/ethnicity, and then further into financial classification or even Rep/Dem/Independent class.
At any rate the OP never asked Tommy, so I'm cutting to another impossible question.
Why he so dumdum?
Comment
-
All very good points. Also by the describe nature of the HIV virus the actual most common demographic victim would be heterosexual women. Because there is no way they can avoid contact with infection because their entire ****** is a mucous membrane. Compared to men who have this tiny little pee hole as a mucous membrane that it would have to travel through. So heterosexual women would indeed be very vulnerable to it. But they are the lowest group of supposed infection.
I wrote an article on this once and if anyone cares to research the topic. I'll post it. It's way off topic though. I believe Tommy himself came to the conclusion that he was not really sick with this. And people thought he was crazy to say so.
Comment
-
Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post- -Any public aids/HIV dialogue is rarely based on science, which to be frank, has morphed into the political to match the dialogue.
Your pie circle is case in point.
The categories are grade school stuff. They cannot pin down who is heterosexual other than the presumed male to female category.
Guaranteed if in a mutual male/female monogamous relationship with both parties noncarriers from the start, ain't gonna get HIV.
And you could say the same for ****sexuals, but the catch is not all ****sexuals are the same. Males are proven to be the highest infected, and then you get into race/ethnicity, and then further into financial classification or even Rep/Dem/Independent class.
At any rate the OP never asked Tommy, so I'm cutting to another impossible question.
Why he so dumdum?
serious health matter. People in this day and age running around having unprotected sex is crazy and reckless. That includes Morrison.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View PostThey did do a 30 for 30 episode on Tommy Morrison that was quite good.
Apparently he would have sex with women right after injecting some kind of drug directly into his penis.
There is some erection drug that p#rn stars apparently use a lot that Tommy was shooting into his **** to get it/keep it hard to f#ck all these hoes. That sorta open skin wound greatly increases your chances of catching something like HIV thru v#gina, an#l & oral sex. If he wasn't doing gay sh^t or doing drugs via needles that's the most likely way he got it. Generally it's very difficult for a man to catch HIV from a woman doing standard sh^t without open wounds on the man from my understanding.
Comment
Comment