Who is the greatest of all time? P4P? Robinson, Leonard, Mayweather or RJJ?

[Rusty Tromboni]

Do you actually think I care about your deflection

It didn't take much to prove you are a coward who is unwilling to address my post which clearly exposes your bias.

Inviting me to play "Guess what bullshlt I'm pulling out of my ass now" doesn't impress me. Try again, coward.

By the way, feel free to scan boxrec and come back and tell me who has a higher percentage of fights outweighing their opponent. I double dare you.

And finally, you know what thread I mean. The thread where nearly every damn post is clowning you. CLOWN

You could just ask for a hint. I'll give you one.

[Rusty Tromboni]

Sugar Ray Robinson. period. end of paragraph...

Disappointing.

I was hoping to see something on the level of Canzoneri's picture-perfect knockouts of Berg (3) and Chocolate (2).

Instead I got lots of flurrying and Bobo Olson.

[MDPopescu]

Sugar Ray Robinson. period. end of paragraph...

Disappointing.

I was hoping to see something on the level of Canzoneri's picture-perfect knockouts of Berg (3) and Chocolate (2).

Instead I got lots of flurrying and Bobo Olson.

... OK, OK... I don't mind...

[travestyny]

You could just ask for a hint. I'll give you one.

You can just stop ducking my posts. You're pathetic

[TonyGe]

OK, Father Tony I will agree with you. Only if that's what it takes for you to tell me which fighters you believe to have avoided Black fighters, and how that hurts their standing.

If you're going to take a stand, Father, make it mean something.

What you are saying is you don't agree but you will pretend to agree under certain conditions. Doesn't cast your integrity in a good light.

[Rusty Tromboni]

What you are saying is you don't agree but you will pretend to agree under certain conditions. Doesn't cast your integrity in a good light.

It's like your in competition with Auntie T to see who can make the most ostentatious comment.

I continually provide your opportunities to make some sort of sense of your original post, but you only further plunge into the absurd.

Do you even have a point? Have you ever had one?

[Rusty Tromboni]

You can just stop ducking my posts. You're pathetic

It sounds like you're giving up...

It's not a trick question. it really is right underneath your nose.

[Rusty Tromboni]

... OK, OK... I don't mind...

So why not lay some Meldrick Taylor on us while you're at it?

Or maybe you're more of a Kimbo Slice guy?

[travestyny]

It sounds like you're giving up...

It's not a trick question. it really is right underneath your nose.

LMAO. Not only are you the clown of the year, but you're the post ducker of the year. Quack quack quack.


Hope you learned your lesson. Now get back to taking a beating in your Lomachenko is P4P better than SRR thread

[PAC-BOY]

So the old-timers didn't primarily think of money, brought more excitement and took part in fewer boring fights that today's boxers?

What is it, that makes you conclude, that this is the case?

So the old-timers didn't primarily think of money NO

brought more excitement and took part in fewer boring fights that today's boxers YES