At least two different metrics can be applied to the phrase "skill as a boxer." It's all in what you measure and how you measure it.
1 The boxer who is so skilled at a few aspects of boxing that no one can overcome him. On a scale of speed from 1 to 10, he gets a 13, for example.
2 The boxer whose skill set is so varied that he has an answer for everyone, and no one can overcome him.
Before we can answer, we have to choose which question we are going to answer. Do we regard one of these types as "more highly," skilled than the other?
Ali and Mayweather proved it can be done both ways. I love it in mathematics when one question can be entirely reduced to a simpler one to grasp. Who was more skilled, Clay or Mayweather? If you can answer that question clearly, you can answer any question about skill set vs skill set for any weights involved.
1 The boxer who is so skilled at a few aspects of boxing that no one can overcome him. On a scale of speed from 1 to 10, he gets a 13, for example.
2 The boxer whose skill set is so varied that he has an answer for everyone, and no one can overcome him.
Before we can answer, we have to choose which question we are going to answer. Do we regard one of these types as "more highly," skilled than the other?
Ali and Mayweather proved it can be done both ways. I love it in mathematics when one question can be entirely reduced to a simpler one to grasp. Who was more skilled, Clay or Mayweather? If you can answer that question clearly, you can answer any question about skill set vs skill set for any weights involved.
Comment