Originally posted by billeau2
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Those who say Tyson never faced a real challenger during his prime how about Tucker?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View PostTucker, Biggs, Thomas, Tubbs, were all legit HWs during that era. Because Tyson made easy work of them should not tarnish them as fighters. Biggs was an Olympic gold medalist, beat Lewis in the '84 Olympics. Tyson often gave up a substantial height advantage over these HWs.
Comment
-
Tucker was probably Tysons best win. Cause Tucker was prime and a decent fighter. Holmes and Spinks were retired when they got lured in on short notice for a payday.
That being said Tucker is tough but didn't come to win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by them_apples View PostTucker was probably Tysons best win. Cause Tucker was prime and a decent fighter. Holmes and Spinks were retired when they got lured in on short notice for a payday.
That being said Tucker is tough but didn't come to win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sentax View Post
All of those fights, regardless as to who wins or loses, have the potential to be very competitive. And likely would be competitive.
Comment
-
Originally posted by uncle ben View PostIt's a myth that Tyson never fought anyone good. His challengers were at least on the level of most other challengers fought by prior and following heavyweight champions. Most prime champions don't get to fight another prime ATG. And if you're comparing Tyson's challengers to the 70's, if you take away the big 3 (Frazier, Foreman and Ali) then you can't really say that the 70's contenders were that much superior to the 80s. For example, regardless of whom you'd pick to win, it's not a foregone conclusion that Jerry Quarry would have beaten Michael Spinks. Or that Norton would have just demolished Tony Tubbs or that Oscar Bonavena would have beaten 38 year old Larry Holmes. Or that Mac Foster would have steam rolled Trevor Berbick or that Ron Lyle just pushes over Pinklon Thomas.
All of those fights, regardless as to who wins or loses, have the potential to be very competitive. And likely would be competitive.
Comment
-
he faced everyone with a title, you bunch of jokers. Nothing is bigger except an elite like tucker, or ATG like holyfield, lewis
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dynamite76 View PostTony was a good fighter, but never truly developed due to injury and managerial problems.
Guaranteed they thought they could beat the snot nosed midget, but after some early exchanges, Tucker took flight in a run and jab strategy that was more survival in hopes the kid not used to the distance would wear out.
King paid daddy in cash with the predictable abandonment of family and King became his daddy.
And we know how that goes. The only King fighters able to retire with intact finances were Holmes who was helped by a loving wife and Tex Cobb.
Tony an A+ talent with a mental fragility that a King could easily exploit much as he did Tyson and others.
Comment
Comment