Floyd, Pernell, Toney, Benitez etc, it seems like all of the all-time greats used at least some kind of variation of it.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who are some of the best defensive fighters who didn't use the philly shell?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by SheenLantern View PostFloyd, Pernell, Toney, Benitez etc, it seems like all of the all-time greats used at least some kind of variation of it.
To me, as in in my day, Archie Moore didn't shell he used a cross arm defense. I reckon it's the same damn thing but when asked who uses shells and who don't that's what jumps to mind.
More don't use a shell, that there be'uh cross.
-
The boxers you named didn't just use the shoulder roll, like all great defensive boxer they utilized more than that, if you're looking for guys that rarely used it though or it wasn't there main defence then
Miguel Lora, Marlon Starling, Winky Wright, Azumah Nelson, Roberto Duran, Willie Pep, Hilario Zapata, Jose Napoles, JCC, Bernard Hopkins, Freddie Welsh, there's plenty.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by SheenLantern View PostFloyd, Pernell, Toney, Benitez etc, it seems like all of the all-time greats used at least some kind of variation of it.
Marchiagano gave you some very good feedback. It would make this excellent topic better if you defined what you call the Philly Shell. Right off the cuff I can see confusion between the Shell and the Shoulder Roll...Certainly what Moore used (As Marchiagano says) bares little resemblance to someone like James Toney (my example), much less Mayweather.
There are at least two sets of movements here to consider: You have positioning the arms and putting the weight back, then you have a whole set if shoulder movements that include angles, protecting the chin, and...counter punching.
Comment
-
The greatest defensive fighters such as Loughran, Tunney, B Leonard, J Johnson all used a wide varied techniques that defined classic boxing. The ability to parry, slip, block, use footwork and then counter to vital areas of an opponents body.
Comment
-
Originally posted by billeau2 View PostMarchiagano gave you some very good feedback. It would make this excellent topic better if you defined what you call the Philly Shell. Right off the cuff I can see confusion between the Shell and the Shoulder Roll...Certainly what Moore used (As Marchiagano says) bares little resemblance to someone like James Toney (my example), much less Mayweather.
There are at least two sets of movements here to consider: You have positioning the arms and putting the weight back, then you have a whole set if shoulder movements that include angles, protecting the chin, and...counter punching.Last edited by NChristo; 01-12-2019, 03:54 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SheenLantern View PostFloyd, Pernell, Toney, Benitez etc, it seems like all of the all-time greats used at least some kind of variation of it.
Benitez relied on his reflexes, and as those slowed, he became a sitting duck. Two Ton Toney was always a face first plodder. Only became defensive when he larded into the heavies, and even then took unholy punishment, the reason he's barely intelligible these days.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NChristo View PostPhilly Shell is just another name for the shoulder roll defense, it's got no connection to the cross arm defense and has never been used for it, can see where the mix up could be made though with the names.
Comment
-
Originally posted by billeau2 View PostThere is another "shell" that Cus taught... Winky Wright used it to my understanding, but I don't know what this was called if it was not called a 'shell' of one sort or another?
Thinking about it when boxers are "in their shell all night" it just means they were in the high guard and were inactive not being able to do anything or if a boxer is told to "go into your shell" they go into the high guard but I think it's but more of a quick way of telling someone to go on the defensive, turn into Josh Clottey for a moment, take the punches on the gloves and think / reset than it is an actual term for it.
Dunno if this is what you're referring to or if there was some kinda mix up somewhere.
Comment
Comment