Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How good was Donald Curry?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by just the facts View Post
    Lucky
    to catch McCrory when he did? Please explain..........
    Just don't see Donald being able to kayo Milton like that in 1982/1983, when they were originally supposed to fight. Donald just took it to another level while Milton plateaued.

    Comment


    • #22
      --- Ring p4p #1 in his pomp...next dumb ?..

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Dynamite76 View Post
        Just don't see Donald being able to kayo Milton like that in 1982/1983, when they were originally supposed to fight. Donald just took it to another level while Milton plateaued.
        You dream up more unlikely shyte than anyone here. You think John Tate would beat Larry Holmes and now you act like Curry was just lucky to beat McCrory. You are certainly entitled to your own opinion no matter how silly it is.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post
          --- Ring p4p #1 in his pomp...next dumb ?..
          For starters, wtf is a "pomp"? Curry was NEVER considered p4o #1, in Currys prime, Hagler had that honor.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by just the facts View Post
            You dream up more unlikely shyte than anyone here. You think John Tate would beat Larry Holmes and now you act like Curry was just lucky to beat McCrory. You are certainly entitled to your own opinion no matter how silly it is.
            You know there is truth in that. And that the facts!

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by just the facts View Post
              For starters, wtf is a "pomp"? Curry was NEVER considered p4o #1, in Currys prime, Hagler had that honor.
              --- More pomp and circumstance from you, eh?

              Ring's first formal p4p ranking came out in 1989 with Tyson the debut #1. Before that, informally among the press Curry and yes Marv were nip and tuck #1.

              Just the facts ma'am, so don't get distracted by your distorted history...

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post
                --- More pomp and circumstance from you, eh?

                Ring's first formal p4p ranking came out in 1989 with Tyson the debut #1. Before that, informally among the press Curry and yes Marv were nip and tuck #1.

                Just the facts ma'am, so don't get distracted by your distorted history...
                You truly are an idiot. At no time did any credible boxing publication/ insider/true fan ever have Curry ranked above Hagler.

                Again, wtf is a pomp?

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Dynamite76 View Post
                  You know there is truth in that. And that the facts!
                  It's cool. I've enjoyed some of your what ifs but some are too far out there for me (Holmes/Tate, Curry/McCrory).

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by just the facts View Post
                    Again, wtf is a pomp?
                    --- You!

                    Next dumb ?

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by just the facts View Post
                      It's cool. I've enjoyed some of your what ifs but some are too far out there for me (Holmes/Tate, Curry/McCrory).
                      It's all good.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP