No boxer could have beat Mike Tyson on the 22nd of November, 1986

[SABBATH]

you have absolutly nothing to base your asumptions on...you just decided in your own head he took steroids becosue you dont like him and want to discredit him anyway you can.......

A young Mike Tyson before steroids...

[Verstyle]

A young Mike Tyson before steroids...

u know damn well he didnt take steriods. he hit the weights when he went to prison and continued out of prison

[SABBATH]

Recent picture off the juice...



Look at his much smaller neck, skinny forearms and narrow shoulders

[Verstyle]

Recent picture off the juice...

ok i absolutly know your playing now.dont know if others will though

[butterfly1964]

Tyson didn't take steriods.

[micky_knox]

ok i absolutly know your playing now.dont know if others will though

he has to be playing.

he isnt that ****** to believe it himself

[BKM-]

Yeah I know. I was just making a point. There are plenty of fighters 30-40 pounds heavier than Tyson. Basically, all I'm saying is that his argument is horse****, because at heavyweight, weight shouldn't affect criteria. Fact of the matter is: Walcott, Charles and Patterson were all heavyweight champions, who would give alot of great HWs fits. Walcott weighed up to 200 pounds, as did Patterson, as did Charles. They all weighed 200 pounds several times (or close to it tens of times). How are they not heavyweights? With modern training, they would be 210-220 pounds. Your argument is **** Yaman, you are a fool.

God, you're the biggest ****head i've ever seen around here. Is there no brain inside your concrete skull? Listen up fool. The bigger you are, the slower you become. Is that too hard to think about? You want me to explain it even better? Pm me if so.

Today, and even in Tyson's area there were Cruiserweights the same size as Walcott, Charles etc. But why dont people mention them in the fastest HW list? Thats right, because they were naturally smaller, thus making them faster. Your argument of guys outweiging Tyson by 30/40 is bull aswell. Because you wont be fast when you're over 240lb. But you will be when you weigh less than 190.

You're the tool once again.

[BKM-]

he has to be playing.

he isnt that ****** to believe it himself

Smasher is probably an alt. He went into these kind of posts months ago and he was banned. Lets hope it happens again

[micky_knox]

Smasher is probably an alt. He went into these kind of posts months ago and he was banned. Lets hope it happens again

indeed

lets hope

[hellfire508]

God, you're the biggest ****head i've ever seen around here. Is there no brain inside your concrete skull? Listen up fool. The bigger you are, the slower you become. Is that too hard to think about? You want me to explain it even better? Pm me if so.

Today, and even in Tyson's area there were Cruiserweights the same size as Walcott, Charles etc. But why dont people mention them in the fastest HW list? Thats right, because they were naturally smaller, thus making them faster. Your argument of guys outweiging Tyson by 30/40 is bull aswell. Because you wont be fast when you're over 240lb. But you will be when you weigh less than 190.

You're the tool once again.

Oh my god! Did you go to school? What education DO you have? I honestly don't think you were born with a fully functional brain!

The people who were "as big as Walcott and Charles" who fought in the cruiserweight division during Tyson's era, aren't mentioned in heavyweight lists because THEY DIDN'T FIGHT AT HEAVYWEIGHT YOU ****ING TOOL!

"The bigger you are, the slower you become". No **** sherlock. Did you figure that out on your own? What I'm saying is the heavies who weighed around 240 who had quick hands, therefore had quicker hands than Tyson because they were heavier. That is what your argument suggests!!!

When someone argues with me about Walcott having faster hands than Ali, I don't say, "Oh but Ali weighed more, so its bull****". Why? Because the heavyweight division has no weight limit, because its minimum weight is deemed to be the weight where a fighter can be competitive with a fighter any weight above them? Understand? Therefore it doesn't matter what you weigh in that division, you are still a heavyweight.

Now, POUND FOR POUND, Tyson had faster hands that Walcott, or Charles. However, as heavyweights, Walcott had faster hands. GET IT? Just like, POUND FOR POUND, Rocky Marciano hit harder than Mike Tyson, but as heavyweights in general, Tyson hit harder? OKAY? Can that tiny little ball of snot inside your head comprehend this?

P.S... they were over 200 many times... get over it.