Froch = the better resume. Calzaghe = the better fighter.

[IronDanHamza]

if that's fair then i saw andre dirrell embarrass froch for most of their fight. you want to open up that can of worms?

and dirrell and calzaghe are both fast southpaws. similar height and reach. styles are different, but there are physical traits that make them more similar than froch and rreid. froch and robin reid aren't realy alike at all. 3-4 inches height difference to start, froch is slow of hand and particularly his upper body, and relies heavily on his reach. fast footed fighters give guys like that a ton of problems, as evidenced by froch's poor showings against dirrell, ward, and taylor.

Dirrell's a really talented fighter and way better than Reid. He's a real underachiever.

I can't compare those two.

I understand Calzaghe had some tools that may trouble Froch but Calzaghe never fought anyone like Froch. Froch would take it to him and do damage. Calzaghe is no Ward.

[Rip Chudd]

While I like Calzaghe, he never knocked out anyone in front of 80,000 at Wembley. FACT!

[Zaroku]

Frock is better, as a fighter, but joe just threw so many punches per round a lot of his opponents couldn't get on track.

[micky36]

Froch is the better fighter and has a way better resume.
สูตรบาคาร่า

[Chollo Vista]

Froch is the greater fighter, but Joe probably would've won head to head at the time

[PRINCEKOOL]

Chris Eubank Senior is better than anyone Carl Froch has beaten 'Even at that stage in his career'.

Note: Calzaghe has a underrated resume 'But overall Froch probably has a deeper resume' etc

[QueensburyRules]

froch looked for a stacked division to clean out and nearly did. calzaghe looked for empty divisions void of talent where he could reign. even his reigns didnt include taking on the best in those weak divisions on a regular basis, he waited until the time was right to pounce on weak opposition with inflated reputations. twice he got caught, thinking eubank and hopkins were more shot than they really were. ended up going life and death with a eubank who was pretty damn shot and losing to hopkins only to get a gift and high tail out of the sport.

do you know how you can tell calzaghe is a fraud? the way he speaks about the roy jones fight.

when larry holmes talks about fighting ali he doesnt pretend it was a great win, he admits that wasnt muhammad ali in the ring that night.

when tyson talks about beating holmes, he doesnt pretend he achieved a huge feat, he admits that version of holmes wasnt the same guy who ruled the world for years.

marciano-louis, pacquiao-dlh, garcia-morales.. the list goes on and on.

the only guys who beat a washed up corpse (and every single one of us knows roy was shot to hell) and pretend its a big deal are ppl who have no other leg to stand on for their so called legacy, not to mention no sincerity, no dignity and no shame as human beings.

calzaghe doesnt admit he beat a corpse, he wants to walk around and act as if he beat the real roy jones when we all know thats not the case.

thats no champion.

froch would never do such a thing.

- -Assassins in their BigBoy trainers these days is it?

Roy Ring ranked #5 when SuperJoe diced him up for U upgrade from strained to Chunky.

Lot of admiration for Froch the fighter, U toddlers soiling U trainers ain't doing him no favors.

[just the facts]

- -Assassins in their BigBoy trainers these days is it?

Roy Ring ranked #5 when SuperJoe diced him up for U upgrade from strained to Chunky.

Lot of admiration for Froch the fighter, U toddlers soiling U trainers ain't doing him no favors.

Does anyone know WTF this guy is talking about?

[QueensburyRules]

Does anyone know WTF this guy is talking about?

- -Talking to U boys in U BigBoy trainers.

What preschool U go to?

[IronDanHamza]

Chris Eubank Senior is better than anyone Carl Froch has beaten 'Even at that stage in his career'.

Note: Calzaghe has a underrated resume 'But overall Froch probably has a deeper resume' etc

Yeah, but, he’s not though is he.