Best UK Boxer of all time

[Humean]

I was looking at the top 25 European fighters between 1915-1940 list that I did a while back and this was the order of the British fighers in the list:

1. Ted Kid Lewis
   • 232-45-25
2. Freddie Welsh
   • 121-29-17
3. Jimmy Wilde
   • 139-4-0
4. Jimmy McLarnin
   • 55-11-3
5. Jack Kid Berg
   • 157-26-9
6. Benny Lynch
   • 88-14-17
7. Jackie Brown
   • 107-24-9
8. Peter Kane
   • 89-8-2

[Canelo and GGG]

Hold up, you were criticizing Wilde's resume but you think Fitzsimmons' is good? You are going to have to show your working on that one.

Iron Dan is weird if its come to resume ,Wilde has some legit guys on resume,but checking Fits resume wont be easy he fought in 1890s and 1900,Most of his fights are not on record . Dan **** on Memphis Pal then prise Hagler resume its hard to figure him out.Resumes of Fitz opponets are not complite too ,Corbett is legit doe

[Canelo and GGG]

I was looking at the top 25 European fighters between 1915-1940 list that I did a while back and this was the order of the British fighers in the list:

1. Ted Kid Lewis
   • 232-45-25
2. Freddie Welsh
   • 121-29-17
3. Jimmy Wilde
   • 139-4-0
4. Jimmy McLarnin
   • 55-11-3
5. Jack Kid Berg
   • 157-26-9
6. Benny Lynch
   • 88-14-17
7. Jackie Brown
   • 107-24-9
8. Peter Kane
   • 89-8-2

Source on Records is boxrec??

[Canelo and GGG]

I forgot about Warnock ,wow hard choice to make here.a lot of good fighters.And small amount of informations about some of them.

[Canelo and GGG]

What about John "Jack" Broughton 1725-1767 was Bare'Knuckle Champion of englad for over 20 years!!! and wwas a man to set up boxing rules (one of first),He never lost a fight in 42 years ,he came up with idea to use gloves,a true legend of boxing,Well pick is to hard boys.So many fighters i cant know them all,some of theyr resumes are hard to check,some are overrated some not.

[soul_survivor]

I watched some videos,his special no daubt,as he was 120-1 or something like that in his prime loseing only to Lee(who was World champ too),it seems like mosr posters pick Wilde,Fits and McLarnin.

you dont need to call us no real fans ,cuse i dont know any ppl who rate Eubank so high,Toney faced better fighters than Eubank faced man.

Toney had a good solid middleweight run but from 160-168 3 of the best guys at that time were Eubank, Watson and Benn. Eubank would beat the other 2. That just leaves Toney, which didn't happen but Eubank was the money man in the division and Toney didn't want to come here. His loss.

And I'm not saying you're not a real fan, I'm saying people in general on here aren't so won't understand or even know how good Eubank was. They will however vote for guys in black and white because they think it makes them sound smart.

Having said that I can understand votes for Fitzsimmons over everyone else because he was a genuine pioneer in this sport.

[Canelo and GGG]

Toney had a good solid middleweight run but from 160-168 3 of the best guys at that time were Eubank, Watson and Benn. Eubank would beat the other 2. That just leaves Toney, which didn't happen but Eubank was the money man in the division and Toney didn't want to come here. His loss.

And I'm not saying you're not a real fan, I'm saying people in general on here aren't so won't understand or even know how good Eubank was. They will however vote for guys in black and white because they think it makes them sound smart.

Having said that I can understand votes for Fitzsimmons over everyone else because he was a genuine pioneer in this sport.

John "Jack" Broughton 1725-1767 was even bigger pioneer then Bob,check him out

i get what you saying here about some fans here,i made this thread and if you will read all post here ,you will see how many names i learned here ,and keep learning,When Iron Dan asked my about Wilde resume,i made deep research(keep doing when i have time).i just dont think that Eubank achived as much in boxing as this guys,his great fighter no daubt.but i love threads like this when i learn alot.i will never know all good fighters but i allways can try,Memphis Pal Moore resume is gold mine of knowwladge on flyweight post WW1,im glad that Dan asked about Wilde resume lol.

[IronDanHamza]

Hold up, you were criticizing Wilde's resume but you think Fitzsimmons' is good? You are going to have to show your working on that one.

Maybe I just really like the Nonpareli win, the jump to Corbett win then going down to win the LHW. That feat impresses me but I do get your thinking. A lot of Bob's resume is incomplete like Wilde's.

That said, I'd say Fitzsimmons resume is definitely better than Wilde's.

[IronDanHamza]

Iron Dan is weird if its come to resume ,Wilde has some legit guys on resume,but checking Fits resume wont be easy he fought in 1890s and 1900,Most of his fights are not on record . Dan **** on Memphis Pal then prise Hagler resume its hard to figure him out.Resumes of Fitz opponets are not complite too ,Corbett is legit doe

I really don't think you're going to find many people who think Memphis Pal Moore has a better resume than Marvin Hagler.

[LacedUp]

Yeah Fitzsimmons has a really good resume.

I don't really think so. Some good wins of course, resume isn't that deep.

Also, surprised no one has mentioned Carl Froch.
He's clearly one of the all time British best imo.