Mike McCallum vs. Marvin Hagler.

**Ray Corso** · 07-20-2015, 03:37 PM

Two different levels in the pros, Mike was a fine fighter to follow and cheer for, he was a good worker.
Hagler is a top ten world middleweight and most have him in the top five!
Mike was at his best at 154, years later he fought as high as 175+.
Hagler wins.
Ray

**Cyberspace** · 07-20-2015, 03:41 PM

Hagler was a lot better at everything.

**Mr.MojoRisin'** · 07-20-2015, 03:50 PM

Hagler fought much better opposition and won usually by ko.

**Sugar Adam Ali** · 07-20-2015, 04:13 PM

Originally posted by Ray Corso

Two different levels in the pros, Mike was a fine fighter to follow and cheer for, he was a good worker.
Hagler is a top ten world middleweight and most have him in the top five!
Mike was at his best at 154, years later he fought as high as 175+.
Hagler wins.
Ray

This^^^^^^^^^^

**Ben Bolt** · 07-20-2015, 04:30 PM

Originally posted by Ray Corso

Hagler is a top ten world middleweight and most have him in the top five! Mike was at his best at 154 Ray

Sorry, Bodysnatcher, you�re one of my favorite fighters, but I can see you drop this 15-rounder.

The scorecards would probably have told, Marvin won pretty big. But just by reading the scorecards, they wouldn�t have revealed that Marvin had to dig deep for most of the 10-9 rounds he gained.

**The Old LefHook** · 07-20-2015, 08:48 PM

Marvin has too much. Maybe the snatcher extends him a bit, but Hag probably batters him out late. The snatcher's main fault was his average speed.

**sonnyboyx2** · 07-21-2015, 12:12 AM

This fight should have happened in the mid-1980s, Hagler sort of avoided it. I would have picked Hagler back then, but McCallum now. I feel McCallum was the better alround tactician, he fought the better opposition and would have been a clear winner.

**Sugar Adam Ali** · 07-21-2015, 01:11 AM

Originally posted by sonnyboyx2

This fight should have happened in the mid-1980s, Hagler sort of avoided it. I would have picked Hagler back then, but McCallum now. I feel McCallum was the better alround tactician, he fought the better opposition and would have been a clear winner.

If mccallum had landed a hagler fight post-Hagler/Hearns like Mugabi did, I think mccallum circa late 85 an on could beat Hagler... He couldn't beat a prime hagler, but I always thought that the hearns fight took something out of hagler and he was never the same..

**ironalex** · 07-21-2015, 01:54 AM

Originally posted by Growth

Hagler was a lot better at everything.

This. No competition.

Mike McCallum vs. Marvin Hagler.