Basically one way to handle this question is to ask: is Tunney in some way fundamentally better than Conn?
Another thing to consider is that because the Louis Conn fight ended the way it did it had the effect of adding intrigue, while answering questions and leaving the promise that things would always be interesting in a match up where Louis, methodical and without rushing, faced a fighter who could not simply evade and wait to become the proverbial active mouse in the snake cage, but a fighter who could give it back, stick, move and then some!
We know that Conn could have won if things had gone a little different. We know that Louis was ultimately succesful....if it took him a while, well thats why we need the championship rounds... I shudder to think how we would know about the superb patience of a fighter like Louis in the 12 round world of today.
Finally regarding Tunney. An exceptional fighter who might have just had the style to beat Louis.... So what think yew!!!!?
Another thing to consider is that because the Louis Conn fight ended the way it did it had the effect of adding intrigue, while answering questions and leaving the promise that things would always be interesting in a match up where Louis, methodical and without rushing, faced a fighter who could not simply evade and wait to become the proverbial active mouse in the snake cage, but a fighter who could give it back, stick, move and then some!
We know that Conn could have won if things had gone a little different. We know that Louis was ultimately succesful....if it took him a while, well thats why we need the championship rounds... I shudder to think how we would know about the superb patience of a fighter like Louis in the 12 round world of today.
Finally regarding Tunney. An exceptional fighter who might have just had the style to beat Louis.... So what think yew!!!!?
Comment