hardest heavyweight puncher

[catskills23]

Definitely a hard hitter and belongs up there somewhere. But his most impressive KO wins were against bums. But that doesnt really matter.

alex stewart was not a big puncher and to say he was one the hardest hitters ever is a joke .

[BKM-]

alex stewart was not a big puncher and to say he was one the hardest hitters ever is a joke .

I didn't say he hit harder than Foreman, i said he belongs in the list of hard hitters behind the big guys like Tyson.

[catskills23]

I didn't say he hit harder than Foreman, i said he belongs in the list of hard hitters behind the big guys like Tyson.

stewart dosent belong on any list there are about 200 heavyweights in history who hit harder than stewart.

[BKM-]

stewart dosent belong on any list there are about 200 heavyweights in history who hit harder than stewart.

Then atleast 150 of them should have done the same thing and KO 40 bums when they were fighting bums huh

[Dye]

stewart dosent belong on any list there are about 200 heavyweights in history who hit harder than stewart.

you are a dumbass, just because he did not beat everyone does not mean he did not hard. and yes he belongs in the top 200 hardest punchers probably 100

[Dye]

and no one said he was the hardest hitter of all time

[SuzieQ49]

going by hecklers logic,


then marciano would easily defeat a "supposdely prime" 25-29 year old walcott since walcott couldnt even beat guys like abe simon or billy ketchell during those years.


marciano KO 1 25-29 year old walcott



so it seems the 37 year old "past his prime" walcott was better than the 25-29 year old "prime" walcott



or do u disagree?



let me ask u, was 34 year old jersey joe in his prime when he fought joe louis?

[SuzieQ49]

a fighters prime is when he is at his BEST AS A FIGHTER


walcott was at his best as a fighter 33-38 years of age, therefore thats his prime, case closed.


as for physical peak, walcott looked in damm good shape physically and chizzled out of his mind in the louis, charles, marciano bouts.

[SuzieQ49]

think of it this way heckler.........

by saying marciano beat a past his prime walcott, ur dismissing the walcott victory as if to say "marciano did not beat the best version of walcott."

HOWEVER,

had marciano fought a 26-29 year old walcott, he would have had a much easier time with jersey joe walcott. in fact that "prime" version of walcott wouldnt last 2 rounds.

yet according to ur logic, u would hold a win over a 26-29 year old walcott for more esteem than a win over a BETTER version of walcott in the 33-38 year old walcott


so this means walcott has to be in his prime at 37 years old since a 37 year old jersey joe WAS BETTER than the 25-29 year old walcott who u say is every fighters prime years.


so please stop saying walcott is past his prime at 37, IF THERE IS NO BETTER VERSION OF WALCOTT THAN THE 37 YEAR OLD JERSEY JOE.

fact is, marciano beat THE BEST version of jersey joe in the first fight. if that doesnt define prime or peak, then i dont know what does

[Kid Achilles]

I'd like to see this site where Tyson's power is documented as well.