Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why todays era is better than past eras. Discussion.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by KnockoutNed View Post
    Yes I know that. My comment was on the decline between 2000 and 2010. However these numbers don't prove the quality of the boxers.
    There hasn't been a decline in fights from 2000 to 2010

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Humean View Post
      That is interesting about the number of fighters Fleischer was aware of.
      Yes his figures I've come across do not seem to vary greatly on a year-to-year basis - so not too sure on their accuracy, but the lowest I have came across is "less than 2,000" during WWII.

      Originally posted by Humean View Post
      I'm not sure how incomplete the recording of shows in Western Europe were at that time but boxrec certainly seems to have recorded a lot. Even though the boxrec numbers of fights that Bundana has posted are still not complete there might be reason to think that the work done on recording the shows in the early 20th century are more complete, relatively speaking, because so many of the shows were in the US.
      I agree. I don't think the figure of missing bouts from that time period to be on a huge scale, especially as you say from the US, but on whether Fleischer's register was on par with BoxRec's - I doubt it.

      Originally posted by Humean View Post
      I think there is no doubt that the top fighters from the 30s and 40s tended to have more fights against the top fighters of their era than today and certainly less likely to fail to fight the very best opponents but I think that can be overstated.
      I have just compared The Ring Magazine's top 10 middlewights on a month-by-month basis from 1942, 1962 and 1982 and the statistics agree with this statement, of which I will post.

      Originally posted by Humean View Post
      Besides I just don't think the average 'world level' fighter in the 30s or 40s was as good as their equivalent of today.
      If by "world level" you would mean a boxer considered to be in the top 5 or 10, I think the 40's may stand up that criteria.

      Originally posted by Humean View Post
      I've been compiling lists of the number of 'world level' fights and opponents that top fighters from the past and present have faced during their careers.
      I enjoy these lists and believe a series of some nature for comparison purposes would make for great reading.
      Last edited by joeandthebums; 03-31-2015, 03:01 PM.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Humean View Post
        There hasn't been a decline in fights from 2000 to 2010
        Originally posted by Bundana View Post
        BoxRec's last decade update (October 23, 2014) showed these number of pro fights:

        1850 2
        1860 15
        1870 339
        1880 4607
        1890 16503
        1900 41984
        1910 94008
        1920 269461
        1930 287746
        1940 202824
        1950 156486
        1960 105133
        1970 104888
        1980 130861
        1990 141126
        2000 185882
        2010 107123
        Unless there was a typo, there was indeed a decline between 2000 and 2010.

        Comment


        • #24
          What follows is contests fought between The Ring Magazine's top 10 ranked Middleweight boxers on a month-by-month basis in the years 1942, 1962 and 1982.

          1942

          Jan -
          Ezzard Charles vs. Anton Christoforidis (#6 LHW)
          Ernie Vigh vs. Coley Welch

          Feb -
          Tony Zale (C) vs. Billy Conn (#1 HW)
          Ceferino Garcia vs. Jackie Wilson (#2 WW)
          Kid Tunero vs. Mose Brown (#4 LHW)

          Mar -
          Ezzard Charles vs. Ken Overlin (#3 LHW)
          Coley Welch vs. Tony Martin
          Kid Tunero vs. Holman Williams (#7 WW)

          Apr -
          Ron Richards vs. Alabama Kid (#8 LHW)
          Kid Tunero vs. Holman Williams (#9 WW)

          May -
          Ezzard Charles vs. Kid Tunero
          Ezzard Charles vs. Charley Burley (#3 WW)
          Coley Welch vs. Tony Martin
          Holman Williams vs. Kid Cocoa (#4 WW)

          Jun -
          Ezzard Charles vs. Charley Burley (#4 WW)

          Jul -
          Ezzard Charles vs. Booker Beckwith (#3 LHW)
          Holman Williams vs. Charley Burley (#4 WW)

          Aug -
          Ezzard Charles vs. Jose Basora
          Nate Bolden vs. Anton Christoforidis (#2 LHW)

          Sep -
          Oct -

          Nov -
          Nate Bolden vs. Johnny Colan (#7 LHW)

          Dec -
          Archie Moore vs. Eddie Booker
          Charley Burley vs. Lloyd Marshall (#5 LHW)

          Total: 22


          1962

          Jan -
          Dick Tiger vs. Florentino Fernandez
          Henry Hank vs. Joey Giardello

          Feb -
          Sugar Ray Robinson vs. Denny Moyer

          Mar -
          Dick Tiger vs. Henry Hank

          Apr -
          Terry Downes vs. Paul Pender

          May -
          June -
          July -

          Aug -
          Denny Moyer vs. Emile Griffith (#C WW)
          George Benton vs. Joey Giardello

          Sep -

          Oct -
          Gene Fullmer vs. Dick Tiger
          Denny Moyer vs. Joey Giambra

          Nov -
          Dec -

          Total: 9


          1982

          Jan -

          Feb -
          Dwight Davison vs. Tony Sibson

          Mar -
          Mustafa Hamsho vs. Curtis Parker

          Apr -
          May -

          Jun -
          Frank Fletcher vs. Clinton Jackson (#9 LMW)

          Jul -
          Aug -
          Sep -

          Oct -
          Marvin Hagler vs. Fulgencio Obelmejias
          Frank Fletcher vs. James Green

          Nov -
          Mustafa Hamsho vs. Bobby Czyz

          Dec -
          Thomas Hearns vs. Wilfred Benitez (#2 LMW) -- Hearns (C) at LMW and rated at MW

          Total: 7

          Comment


          • #25
            How do you define better, for starters.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by joeandthebums View Post

              If by "world level" you would mean a boxer considered to be in the top 5 or 10, I think the 40's may stand up that criteria.
              The way I was considering 'world level' was that the opponent faced could reasonable be ranked in the top 10 in the world at that moment. I tried to make that determination based on both their actual Ring Magazine ranking and also what their record leading into the fight was suggesting. Like all these matters it obviously involves a certain amount of subjective evaluation on my part so my own bias might enter into it.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by KnockoutNed View Post
                Unless there was a typo, there was indeed a decline between 2000 and 2010.
                The 2000 figure was referring to 2000-2010 decade and the 2010 figure was referring to the 2010-2020 decade. Here is the actual year by year from 2000 to 2010. As you can see there has been a fairly substantial increase.

                2010 21053
                2009 20902
                2008 20625
                2007 20714
                2006 20087
                2005 19552
                2004 18406
                2003 17113
                2002 17001
                2001 16026
                2000 15071

                Check out the following thread for the source for this. http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.ph...01907&start=25

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Humean View Post
                  The 2000 figure was referring to 2000-2010 decade and the 2010 figure was referring to the 2010-2020 decade. Here is the actual year by year from 2000 to 2010. As you can see there has been a fairly substantial increase.

                  2010 21053
                  2009 20902
                  2008 20625
                  2007 20714
                  2006 20087
                  2005 19552
                  2004 18406
                  2003 17113
                  2002 17001
                  2001 16026
                  2000 15071

                  Check out the following thread for the source for this. http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.ph...01907&start=25
                  Thanks for the clarification and the link.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by joeandthebums View Post
                    What follows is contests fought between The Ring Magazine's top 10 ranked Middleweight boxers on a month-by-month basis in the years 1942, 1962 and 1982.

                    1942

                    Jan -
                    Ezzard Charles vs. Anton Christoforidis (#6 LHW)
                    Ernie Vigh vs. Coley Welch

                    Feb -
                    Tony Zale (C) vs. Billy Conn (#1 HW)
                    Ceferino Garcia vs. Jackie Wilson (#2 WW)
                    Kid Tunero vs. Mose Brown (#4 LHW)

                    Mar -
                    Ezzard Charles vs. Ken Overlin (#3 LHW)
                    Coley Welch vs. Tony Martin
                    Kid Tunero vs. Holman Williams (#7 WW)

                    Apr -
                    Ron Richards vs. Alabama Kid (#8 LHW)
                    Kid Tunero vs. Holman Williams (#9 WW)

                    May -
                    Ezzard Charles vs. Kid Tunero
                    Ezzard Charles vs. Charley Burley (#3 WW)
                    Coley Welch vs. Tony Martin
                    Holman Williams vs. Kid Cocoa (#4 WW)

                    Jun -
                    Ezzard Charles vs. Charley Burley (#4 WW)

                    Jul -
                    Ezzard Charles vs. Booker Beckwith (#3 LHW)
                    Holman Williams vs. Charley Burley (#4 WW)

                    Aug -
                    Ezzard Charles vs. Jose Basora
                    Nate Bolden vs. Anton Christoforidis (#2 LHW)

                    Sep -
                    Oct -

                    Nov -
                    Nate Bolden vs. Johnny Colan (#7 LHW)

                    Dec -
                    Archie Moore vs. Eddie Booker
                    Charley Burley vs. Lloyd Marshall (#5 LHW)

                    Total: 22


                    1962

                    Jan -
                    Dick Tiger vs. Florentino Fernandez
                    Henry Hank vs. Joey Giardello

                    Feb -
                    Sugar Ray Robinson vs. Denny Moyer

                    Mar -
                    Dick Tiger vs. Henry Hank

                    Apr -
                    Terry Downes vs. Paul Pender

                    May -
                    June -
                    July -

                    Aug -
                    Denny Moyer vs. Emile Griffith (#C WW)
                    George Benton vs. Joey Giardello

                    Sep -

                    Oct -
                    Gene Fullmer vs. Dick Tiger
                    Denny Moyer vs. Joey Giambra

                    Nov -
                    Dec -

                    Total: 9


                    1982

                    Jan -

                    Feb -
                    Dwight Davison vs. Tony Sibson

                    Mar -
                    Mustafa Hamsho vs. Curtis Parker

                    Apr -
                    May -

                    Jun -
                    Frank Fletcher vs. Clinton Jackson (#9 LMW)

                    Jul -
                    Aug -
                    Sep -

                    Oct -
                    Marvin Hagler vs. Fulgencio Obelmejias
                    Frank Fletcher vs. James Green

                    Nov -
                    Mustafa Hamsho vs. Bobby Czyz

                    Dec -
                    Thomas Hearns vs. Wilfred Benitez (#2 LMW) -- Hearns (C) at LMW and rated at MW

                    Total: 7
                    Yeah that does capture the differences over time. One of the most notable differences is that fighters from the 40s were about as likely to fight opponents a division down or up from their own.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      I have never been more confident that these statistics are bogus. Small arenas across the country had regular cards for low level pros up to the 1950s.

                      It is typically myopic of non staticticians to compare the eras on an absolute numbers basis. The U.S. population when I was a kid was about 180 million, now it is pushing double that. Saturation was much higher then than now.

                      Statistics do more harm than good in the hands of people who have no idea how to handle a data set. Massaging statistics is every day business in our world. Both political parties and their minions indulge in it constantly, which is why the statistics given on the O'Reilly show will often differ from those on MSNBC, etc.

                      Of course no one here has an agenda. Or do they? The title of the thread suggests they do. Someone here has an agenda that boxers are better today than in the past, so bogus statistics based on absolute numbers are conscripted to prove it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP