So, he's a guy who writes for the Evening Standard and he put up a list of his top 10 greatest boxers ever. I don't really read the paper but here's the list and it's an interesting one:
1. Robinson (a bit obvious at this point)
2. Ali...obvious again
3. Armstrong, the holy trinity is complete
4. Louis
5. Pep (personally I'd have him def above Louis and possibly Armstrong too)
6. Leonard (good pick, a bit high?)
7. Duran
8. Greb (possibly not my top 10)
9. Marciano (the first real big shocker and a crazy pick imo)
10. Hopkins (I'm a fan, I'd have him top 20 but at 10?)
So no Charles, Moore, the likes of Hopkins and Marciano above Hagler and a few others, what do you all make of it?
1. Robinson (a bit obvious at this point)
2. Ali...obvious again
3. Armstrong, the holy trinity is complete
4. Louis
5. Pep (personally I'd have him def above Louis and possibly Armstrong too)
6. Leonard (good pick, a bit high?)
7. Duran
8. Greb (possibly not my top 10)
9. Marciano (the first real big shocker and a crazy pick imo)
10. Hopkins (I'm a fan, I'd have him top 20 but at 10?)
So no Charles, Moore, the likes of Hopkins and Marciano above Hagler and a few others, what do you all make of it?
Comment