Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Sam Langford the greatest fighter never to win a world title?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Weltschmerz View Post
    Yet by todays standards, he would not even make it at cruiserweight.
    Yes and that sacko'potatoes in your gif that Vlad is recieving virtually no blowback from would beat the likes of Langford by the mere advantages of superior genetics, size, an evolved understanding of boxing (as displayed in the Gif) etc? Yes?

    As a matter of fact, if you go back past Figg boxing in Middle Earth was the province of elves....the best of which stood 5 foot 2 inches....at the heavyweight division no less!!

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by jas View Post
      Sam Langford fought all the way from lightweight to heavyweight, and continued to fight - and win - even after becoming almost completely blind in one eye and partially blind in another. Problem was that he was just too good. That, and the fact that heavyweight career overlapped with that of Jack Johnson - who refused to give him a title shot.
      Yes and it ain't close.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by BattlingNelson View Post
        From boxrec encyclopedia:



        I think the champion who avoided Burley the most was Henry Armstrong.
        There is NO case for Robinson avoiding Burley as a champion. None. He won the Welter title years after Burley moved to Middle and the Middle crown after Burley retired. This whole Burley got ducked by Ray thing wilts under the timeline and all we have are second hand comments. Sure, they could have had a non-title fight if the money was there but it wasn't. Ray went to Middle even at Welter often but he did it for money. How do you duck a guy when you don't have anything he would want? Their Welterweight overlap was relatively short. Burley's last fight within a pound of Welter was in early 42. Robinson turned pro at Lightweight in 1940 and was still cutting his teeth at Welter in early 42 against Zivic. He didn't even start the LaMotta rivalry until late that year and look where those fights were location wise. Those brought house. "He fought someone else while we were contending for titles in different divisions" isn't a duck.

        Good observation: Burley was a leading contender to Armstrong and Zivic and then Zale (who was in the war for years so he gets somewhat a pass on a ducking charge). He was never a contender to Ray.
        Last edited by crold1; 05-09-2014, 09:08 AM.

        Comment


        • #34
          What a warrior Langford was compared to Floyd "Queen of the Catchweights" Mayweather, who refused to fight Canelo at 154 and made him weight-drain a bit to 152. Mayweather is actually taller with a longer reach than Langford.

          The fearless Sam Langford was just 156 pounds when he fought Jack Johnson for the heavyweight title!

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Freedom2014 View Post
            What a warrior Langford was compared to Floyd "Queen of the Catchweights" Mayweather, who refused to fight Canelo at 154 and made him weight-drain a bit to 152. Mayweather is actually taller with a longer reach than Langford.

            The fearless Sam Langford was just 156 pounds when he fought Jack Johnson for the heavyweight title!
            That was before Jack won the title but, yes, Langford had giant sack.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Freedom2014 View Post
              What a warrior Langford was compared to Floyd "Queen of the Catchweights" Mayweather, who refused to fight Canelo at 154 and made him weight-drain a bit to 152. Mayweather is actually taller with a longer reach than Langford.

              The fearless Sam Langford was just 156 pounds when he fought Jack Johnson for the heavyweight title!
              Just shut the fck up. No one really likes Floyd anymore but your agenda against him is pathetic, you contribute nothing to this site.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by crold1 View Post
                That was before Jack won the title but, yes, Langford had giant sack.
                Talking about giant sacks. Joe Gans lost a a decision after 15 rounds to Langford. That in itself is perhaps not exceptional, but if one throws in that Gans beat the undefeated Dave Holly the day before and travelled 300 miles the next day to go the distance with Langford!

                I know this isn't a Gans thread, but I had to throw it in here.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by BattlingNelson View Post
                  Talking about giant sacks. Joe Gans lost a a decision after 15 rounds to Langford. That in itself is perhaps not exceptional, but if one throws in that Gans beat the undefeated Dave Holly the day before and travelled 300 miles the next day to go the distance with Langford!

                  I know this isn't a Gans thread, but I had to throw it in here.
                  ddd

                  Anyone who knows anything about Bawldimore will tell you that three of the best things to come out of that ****hole are steamed blue crabs and the old bay that accompanies them, babe Ruth and Gans!

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by billeau2 View Post
                    ??????!!!!!
                    !?????????!?!?!

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Holywarrior View Post
                      !?????????!?!?!
                      When I think of the word 'accomplished' I think of skills, experience, the use of a craft and my dear friend?????? NOBODY is a way more accomplished fighter than Burley. Langford may be better, have a better resume, be handsomer, uglier, thinner, fatter, have more hair, less hair, but Burley was one of the truly consumate fighters ever to step into a ring.

                      Your comment comes across as exxagerated at best, ridiculous at worse...zi like to give the enefit of the doubt so I will say you have exxagerated the accomplishments of any fighter compared to Burley

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP