Joe Louis, Julian Jackson, Yuri Arbachakov, Tyson, Shavers, Foreman, Roy Jones, etc are just some of the guys I checked.
They all leave their legs behind when they rotate their hips fully.
So ive been told by many on here when I asked this question before that they dont rotate their feet and legs fully because they dont want to be countered heavily and that is BS! Why? Because if you hips are fully turned then you can be nearly* fully countered. If the hips were moving partially that would be a different story but they are not for alot of these guys.
So If you leave the legs behind, you loose power and weight, so why do all boxers tend to leave them behind? (Even when finishing off a non firing back opponent)
(the hips rotate fully but the legs rotate very little, its more powerful if both the legs and hips rotate fully also you cant drive with the legs fully unless they turn in fully esp on the cross)
They all leave their legs behind when they rotate their hips fully.
So ive been told by many on here when I asked this question before that they dont rotate their feet and legs fully because they dont want to be countered heavily and that is BS! Why? Because if you hips are fully turned then you can be nearly* fully countered. If the hips were moving partially that would be a different story but they are not for alot of these guys.
So If you leave the legs behind, you loose power and weight, so why do all boxers tend to leave them behind? (Even when finishing off a non firing back opponent)
(the hips rotate fully but the legs rotate very little, its more powerful if both the legs and hips rotate fully also you cant drive with the legs fully unless they turn in fully esp on the cross)
Comment