Who ranks higher at 147 lbs: Jose Napoles or Sugar Ray Leonard?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The plunger man
    the minge monster
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2014
    • 9139
    • 1,021
    • 263
    • 67,551

    #21
    Sugar ray Leonard is number 1 in my opinion......no one was better at welterweight

    Comment

    • The Old LefHook
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2015
      • 6421
      • 746
      • 905
      • 98,868

      #22
      Originally posted by GhostofDempsey
      I would rate Leonard slightly higher. His rematch with Duran was on very short notice, when his people got word that Duran had packed on 40+ pounds after their fight and was partying like a rock star, Duran was given short notice to prepare for the rematch and nearly ruined himself trying to make weight. Otherwise, Leonard's wins over Hearns and Benitez rank higher than Napoles wins over Griffith and Cokes, but not by a wide margin. Griffith and Cokes were great fighters.
      How were Griffith & Cokes age-wise when Napoles beat them? I didn't notice him much in his day until he stepped up to lose to Monzon. Just surviving against the galoot was impressive.

      From any film I have ever seen, though, his speed rating would be rather pedestrian but his boxing IQ high. He is not fast--but he is slick!

      The tail of the horse never kills the fly, and that would be Napoles attacking Leonard, wouldn't it?

      Comment

      • lopez12
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Feb 2006
        • 106
        • 2
        • 29
        • 6,783

        #23
        Agree. Going solely off resume without a shadow of a doubt for me. To the eye though I have them ranked fairly equal and think they'd both fare similarly against one another's opponents.

        Comment

        • GhostofDempsey
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2017
          • 31345
          • 12,917
          • 8,587
          • 493,602

          #24
          Originally posted by The Old LefHook
          How were Griffith & Cokes age-wise when Napoles beat them? I didn't notice him much in his day until he stepped up to lose to Monzon. Just surviving against the galoot was impressive.

          From any film I have ever seen, though, his speed rating would be rather pedestrian but his boxing IQ high. He is not fast--but he is slick!

          The tail of the horse never kills the fly, and that would be Napoles attacking Leonard, wouldn't it?
          Age wise there was only a 2-3 year difference between them, and they were all at around the same number of fights when they fought. In a head to head fight I'd have to favor Leonard by decision in a close fight.

          Comment

          • them_apples
            Lord
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Aug 2007
            • 9761
            • 1,180
            • 900
            • 41,722

            #25
            Napoles was supremely skilled but also an alcoholic. Leonard had coke issues but we saw his prime without any ******* at least.

            Leonard IMO ranks higher, beat better fighters and really showed up when it matters. True champion.

            Comment

            • The Old LefHook
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2015
              • 6421
              • 746
              • 905
              • 98,868

              #26
              Leonard gives Robinson all he wants, the only difference being that Robby would get him in trouble a few times.

              Comment

              • them_apples
                Lord
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2007
                • 9761
                • 1,180
                • 900
                • 41,722

                #27
                Originally posted by The Old LefHook
                How were Griffith & Cokes age-wise when Napoles beat them? I didn't notice him much in his day until he stepped up to lose to Monzon. Just surviving against the galoot was impressive.

                From any film I have ever seen, though, his speed rating would be rather pedestrian but his boxing IQ high. He is not fast--but he is slick!

                The tail of the horse never kills the fly, and that would be Napoles attacking Leonard, wouldn't it?
                Leonard is for sure faster. but smooth is fast, and napoles is smooth as hell.you can't see his punches coming because he never explodes. kinda like Ali.

                Comment

                • Rusty Tromboni
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2018
                  • 4353
                  • 70
                  • 103
                  • 116,487

                  #28
                  Originally posted by The Old LefHook
                  How were Griffith & Cokes age-wise when Napoles beat them? I didn't notice him much in his day until he stepped up to lose to Monzon. Just surviving against the galoot was impressive.

                  From any film I have ever seen, though, his speed rating would be rather pedestrian but his boxing IQ high. He is not fast--but he is slick!

                  The tail of the horse never kills the fly, and that would be Napoles attacking Leonard, wouldn't it?
                  ....
                  Originally posted by GhostofDempsey
                  Age wise there was only a 2-3 year difference between them, and they were all at around the same number of fights when they fought. In a head to head fight I'd have to favor Leonard by decision in a close fight.
                  You guys aren't serious that Griffith had any business taking that fight are you?

                  Cokes and Lewis were just fine when they fought Napoles. Napoles out-classed them.


                  To answer the question, I dunno how well Napoles does H2H against many of the best Welterweights, but if you weren't good enough to avoid or overcome his wheelhouse, the effect was pure violence. Gorgeous violence, but a massacre none the less.

                  Leonard was Rodriguez 2.0. Outside of Robinson and Duran, I really don't think anyone bests him. He's too mobile. And his power will prevail across 15 rounds.

                  I really like Napoles. And he might even have been too small for it to be fair to compare him to other Welterweights (most of the greats were really just Middleweights waiting to happen, anyway). I think his performances are better eye-candy than Ray's, but Ray certainly beat the better competition, and was a much more mobile fighter.

                  Comment

                  • Rusty Tromboni
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2018
                    • 4353
                    • 70
                    • 103
                    • 116,487

                    #29
                    Originally posted by lopez12
                    Agree. Going solely off resume without a shadow of a doubt for me. To the eye though I have them ranked fairly equal and think they'd both fare similarly against one another's opponents.
                    Napoles has no business in the ring w/ Hearns.

                    Leonard might not quite brutalize Napoles' competition quite like Jose did. He'll rely more on his wheels and stamina; drag them into deep waters before finishing them.

                    Comment

                    • GhostofDempsey
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2017
                      • 31345
                      • 12,917
                      • 8,587
                      • 493,602

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Rusty Tromboni
                      ....


                      You guys aren't serious that Griffith had any business taking that fight are you?

                      Cokes and Lewis were just fine when they fought Napoles. Napoles out-classed them.


                      To answer the question, I dunno how well Napoles does H2H against many of the best Welterweights, but if you weren't good enough to avoid or overcome his wheelhouse, the effect was pure violence. Gorgeous violence, but a massacre none the less.

                      Leonard was Rodriguez 2.0. Outside of Robinson and Duran, I really don't think anyone bests him. He's too mobile. And his power will prevail across 15 rounds.

                      I really like Napoles. And he might even have been too small for it to be fair to compare him to other Welterweights (most of the greats were really just Middleweights waiting to happen, anyway). I think his performances are better eye-candy than Ray's, but Ray certainly beat the better competition, and was a much more mobile fighter.
                      According to Griffith himself; “I was in the best shape of my career but I just couldn't get up in the fight. But I must say Napoles is a very good champion." - Emile Griffith.

                      He may have been on the tail end of his prime, but he was still game. After the Napoles fight he went on a ten fight win streak before losing to Monzon.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP