Originally posted by Dempsey1238
And I especially like the fact that you've included McAuliffe in there, as I think it's unfortunate that he doesn't get nearly the amount of credit he used to back in the first half of the century (or last century now). Nowadays people seem to focus more on the controversy surrounding a couple of his fights as a way of discrediting him and a high ranking in this division, but for a number of years after he retired, the guy was one of the main benchmarks for other great Lightweight to be compared against...He'd make my top fifteen, for sure, and likely makes my top dozen.
Battling Nelson is another guy who's often left off such lists, but the tough-as-hell Dane is another guy who should be remembered as one of the legends of the Lightweight division...He'd make my top twenty, for sure, and possibly top fifteen. Would most likely be my choice as the toughest Lightweight of all-time, as well.
And I tend to give the Lightweight version of Armstrong credit for what he did during the first part of his Welterweight reign, when he routinely weighed under the Lightweight limit (concievably, I don't rank him as high as others do at Welterweight). I have a tendency to do that for other fighters/divisions, as well, like when Terry McGovern defeated George Dixon for the Featherweight title while both of them weighed in under the modern Bantamweight limit, which propels McGovern right near the very top of a list of who I think the greatest Bantamweights in history are/were (Dixon also gets the same credit for a number of his title defenses while weighing under 118).
Anyways...Good stuff, Greek!
Comment