Originally posted by Scott9945
View Post
Wlad's PEAK was 2010ish-Current. Wlad was certainly in his prime against both Sanders and Brewster. Tyson's PEAK was Spinks, but he was definitely prime against Douglas. Wladimir's level of opposition is not better than Tyson's though.
Wlad's best win(imo) is Chris Byrd. Chris Byrd was already a Ike Left over. I hate using that word, but Ike knocked out Byrd in a way that definitely made him 'left over'. Byrd was foaming and it was scary to see, I thought he was seriously hurt. It wasn't the type of hurt like Pacquaio or Williams laid out sleep mode hurt, it was more like 'wow he hit him so hard he got brain damage hurt'.
But you don't really pick out a best win. That's not how you gauge a fighter's career. What you do is pick out his top 5-7 wins.
Wlad's top 5-7 in whatever order is probably
Byrd-Peter-Sultan-Chaguev-Haye-Thompson-Chambers.
Tyson's would include
Tucker-Spinks-Ruddock-Ruddock-Berbick-Tubbs-Bruno etc. Maybe throw in an old Larry Holmes.
So on resume, a case could be made that they are similar. They both have glaring weaknesses in terms of legacy and we can all admit that.
Wlad didn't avenge 2 of his 3 brutal defeats and the only one he avenged was pretty hallow. Tyson didn't avenge any. Both were knocked out in either their physical prime or boxing prime. Tyson have the edge there because he went to prison for a long time and was never the same. Wlad was always prepared and training but still suffered very hard to explain defeats.
One of the big issues with Wladimir is that he is the only ATG that actually couldn't have beaten a big under dog in a supposed rematch.
Gun to my head- I will say Wlad lose again by Ko if he fought Sanders 4 months after his first lost.
Gun to my head- I will say Tyson beat Douglas in rematch four months later.
Wlad actually couldn't beat Sanders. Corrie Sanders was literally Wladimir's conqueror in every single sense of the word.
Comment