WBO was considered a 2nd tier title until 2004

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • joe strong
    Average Joe
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 17786
    • 1,758
    • 832
    • 58,015

    #11
    Originally posted by Cardinal Buck
    It didn't go from nothing to something overnight. It gained most of its legitimacy slowly, largely based on Hamed and Calzaghe's insistence that it was a legitimate belt.
    just like what i posted earlier. google the WBO existance. when did the WBO get recognized as a world title? that's all you need to type...

    Comment

    • Cardinal Buck
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2011
      • 1757
      • 75
      • 186
      • 8,133

      #12
      Why the f uck do I need to type something into google for you? I lived through it.

      Comment

      • totalstranga
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2007
        • 1045
        • 31
        • 26
        • 7,437

        #13
        Originally posted by joe strong
        just like what i posted earlier. google the WBO existance. when did the WBO get recognized as a world title? that's all you need to type...
        I'm about the same age as you, and i remember when it (WBO) didn't mean ****.

        I think Hamed beating guys with "legit' alphabet belts and then vacating may have helped.

        But for god's sake. wait until some kid in the future says Tyson wasn't Undisputed in 1989 bc of the WBO belt. I willgo Archie Bunker on his azz

        Comment

        • joe strong
          Average Joe
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2009
          • 17786
          • 1,758
          • 832
          • 58,015

          #14
          Originally posted by totalstranga
          I'm about the same age as you, and i remember when it (WBO) didn't mean ****.

          I think Hamed beating guys with "legit' alphabet belts and then vacating may have helped.

          But for god's sake. wait until some kid in the future says Tyson wasn't Undisputed in 1989 bc of the WBO belt. I willgo Archie Bunker on his azz
          lol! they will say that about lennox...

          Comment

          • StarshipTrooper
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Mar 2007
            • 17917
            • 1,180
            • 1,344
            • 26,849

            #15
            Originally posted by joe strong
            lol! they will say that about lennox...
            If they do then I'll just have more idiots to laugh at. Lennox was champ and no worthless WBO belt can change that.

            Poet

            Comment

            • taansend
              In denial about UK refs
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2004
              • 2444
              • 157
              • 428
              • 9,153

              #16
              I remember watching the very first WBO title fight.

              I thought Hearns was going to try to Kinchen in the 4th round.

              Comment

              • Scott9945
                Gonna be more su****ious
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2007
                • 22032
                • 741
                • 1,371
                • 30,075

                #17
                Originally posted by taansend
                I remember watching the very first WBO title fight.

                I thought Hearns was going to try to Kinchen in the 4th round.
                Hearns was fortunate to even get the decision in that fight.

                Comment

                • MRBOOMER
                  My skin I get it
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 3115
                  • 109
                  • 1
                  • 9,858

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Scott9945
                  Hearns was fortunate to even get the decision in that fight.
                  He really was but it set up the second hearns Leonard showdown didn't?

                  If it did that was why he got the descion.

                  Comment

                  • joe strong
                    Average Joe
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 17786
                    • 1,758
                    • 832
                    • 58,015

                    #19
                    Originally posted by poet682006
                    If they do then I'll just have more idiots to laugh at. Lennox was champ and no worthless WBO belt can change that.

                    Poet
                    well said...

                    Comment

                    • UglyPug
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jun 2010
                      • 9561
                      • 403
                      • 159
                      • 13,951

                      #20
                      Good thread Joe Dirt! Haha. . .

                      I never knew that. Always assumed it had been relevant for a few decades.

                      It shows how a sanctioning body can go from second tier, to first.

                      Sometimes it doesn't even bother me anymore, though. I mean, it's not like real fans don't know who is a deserving champion, and who isn't. If they can be used as tools to help make better fights for the fans, then it's not a big deal IMO.

                      Also, fighting for these titles will always keep a boxer form negotiating for a 10 rounder, rather than a 12 rounder.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP